Abstract:PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to find out how corporate social responsibility (CSR) is viewed in the Chinese situation. The paper views CSR as an endogenous motivation for corporate social behaviour. The intended contributions of this paper are twofold. On the one hand, the authors intend to collect first‐hand data to understand the current status of Chinese managers' cognitions of CSR. On the other hand the paper intends to analyse the differences which exist in managers' cognitions on CSR among different kinds of firms in a Chinese context.Design/methodology/approachA random survey was conducted among 157 businessmen using the force‐choice questionnaire, based on the four‐part construct proposed by Carroll. The confirmatory factor analysis was utilized to test the construct validity of Carroll's conceptual model with the data sample drawn from Chinese situation. Then correlation, six pairwise t‐tests and MANOVA test were conducted for the purpose of this study.FindingsChinese managers' cognition of CSR is found to be consistent with the four‐component construct. A relatively strong preference toward economic component has been examined. The results present a significant negative correlation between economic cognition and all three of its non‐economic counterparts. No significant cognitive differences have been verified between firms with different characteristics.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper initially examined the cognition of Chinese managers toward CSR. Chinese managers are viewed as having an important role in decision making on social issues. However, how to promote the managers' cognition of CSR is needed for future research which will also examine the internal driving mechanism of CSR.Originality/valueThere has not been a great deal of empirical research done in the field of social responsibility in China. This study is a starting point for those who seek to understand the economic and sociological aspects of mainland Chinese business.

Is corporate social responsibility value relevant? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment of anti-corruption campaign

Corporate Philanthropy and Corporate Misconduct: Evidence from China

Do anti-corruption campaigns affect corporate environmental responsibility? Evidence from China

Chinese Managers' Cognition of Corporate Social Responsibility: an Empirical Investigation

Anti-corruption and corporate environmental responsibility: Evidence from China’s anti-corruption campaign

Government Initiated Corporate Social Responsibility Activities: Evidence from a Poverty Alleviation Campaign in China

Political Connection, Corporate Philanthropy and Efficiency: Evidence from China's Anti-Corruption Campaign

Political connection, corporate philanthropy and efficiency: Evidence from China’s anti-corruption campaign

Poverty Mitigation and Anti-Corruption Campaigns: Evidence from Chinese Cities

Anti-corruption campaign and corporate cash holdings: Evidence from China

Anti-corruption campaign and corporate tax evasion: evidence from China

Corporate social responsibility and financial fraud: evidence from China

Is Corporate Social Responsibility Used To Mask Corporate Speculation? Evidence From Emerging China

Anti-corruption Campaigns and Pay-performance Sensitivity: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

Is the Chinese Anticorruption Campaign Authentic? Evidence from Corporate Investigations

Determinants of Managerial Values on Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from China

Corporate social responsibility and firm value: evidence from Chinese targeted poverty alleviation

An Empirical Study Of Csr In List Companies: A Corporate Communication Perspective

Do Political Ties Cause Over-Investment in Corporate Social Responsibility? Empirical Evidence from Chinese Private Firms

Corporate social responsibility and corporate innovation efficiency: evidence from China

The Politics of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from China