Abstract:Background: To prevent the absorption and collapse of the labial bone plate of the anterior teeth, immediate implantation and socket shield technique have been increasingly applied to anterior dental aesthetic implant restoration. Objective: To provide a biomechanical basis for implant restoration of maxillary anterior teeth, finite element analysis was used to investigate the stress peak and distribution in different anatomical sites of natural teeth, conventional immediate implantation and socket shield technique. Methods: Three maxillary finite element models were established, including a maxillary incisor as a natural tooth, a conventional immediate implantation and a socket shield technique. A mechanical load of 100 N was applied to simulate and analyze the biomechanical behavior of the root, periodontal ligament (PDL), implant and surrounding bone interface. Results: The stress distribution of the natural tooth was relatively uniform under load. The maximum von Mises stress of the root, periodontal ligament, cortical bone and cancellous bone were 20.14 MPa, 2.473 MPa, 19.48 MPa and 5.068 MPa, respectively. When the conventional immediate implantation was loaded, the stress was mainly concentrated around the neck of implant. Maximum stress on the surface of the implant was 102 MPa, the cortical bone was 16.13 MPa, and the cancellous bone was 18.29 MPa. When the implantation with socket shield technique was loaded, the stress distribution of the implant was similar to that of immediate implantation. Maximum stress on the surface of the implant was 100.5 MPa, the cortical bone was 23.11 MPa, the cancellous bone was 21.66 MPa, the remaining tooth fragment was 29.42 MPa and the periodontal ligament of the tooth fragment was 1.131 MPa. Conclusions: 1. Under static loading, both socket shield technology and conventional immediate implantation can support the esthetic restoration of anterior teeth biomechanically. 2.Under short-term follow-up, both immediate implant and socket shield technology achieved satisfactory clinical results, including bone healing and patient satisfaction. 3.The stress distribution is mainly located on the buccal bone surface of the implant and is associated with resorption of the buccal bone plate after implant replacement in both socket shield technology and conventional immediate implantation. 4.The presence of retained root fragment had an impact on the bone graft gap. In immediate implantation, the peak stress was located in the cortical bone near the implant position, while in socket shield technology, the peak stress was at the neck of the cortical bone corresponding to the retained root fragment.

Socket shield technique versus sticky bone in immediate dental implant in esthetic zone

Evaluation of soft tissue and labial plate of bone stability with immediate implant in direct contact versus gap with socket shield: A randomized clinical trial with 1 year follow-up

Comparison of Three-Dimensional Bone Changes in Socket Shield Technique Versus Immediate Implant Placement - A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial

Immediate implant placement with platelet rich fibrin as space filling material versus deproteinized bovine bone in maxillary premolars: A randomized clinical trial

[Clinical Effect Evaluation of Immediate Implant and Immediate Restoration with Socket-Shield Technique in Aesthetic Area: a Retrospective Study with Up to 5-Year Follow-Up].

Comparing Bone Alteration and Aesthetic Recovery Between the Socket-Shield Technique and the Conventional Immediate Implant Technique: A Retrospective Study

Esthetic Evaluation of Maxillary Anterior Immediate Implant with Provisionalization with or without Bone Grafting

Autogenous bone ring transplant versus sticky bone in defective socket augmentation with simultaneous implant placemen

[Clinical Evaluation of Socket Shield Technique in Maxillary Anterior Region].

Comparative analysis of sticky bone and demineralized bone matrix with calcium sulfate hemihydrate on alveolar bone and papillary levels in immediate two-stage dental implant placement: A clinico-radiographic evaluation

Immediate implant and socket preservation using sticky bone and leukocyte-platelet-rich fibrin in the anterior maxilla: A 3-year case report

Biomechanical characteristics of maxillary anterior incisor, conventional immediate implantation and socket shield technique - A finite element analysis and case report

Retrospective Radiological and Clinical Study

Application of Socket-Shield Technique for Immediate Implant Placement in Aesthetic Area

Immediate implant placement with immediate or delayed provisionalization in the maxillary aesthetic zone: A 10‐year randomized trial

Clinical Efficacy of the Socket Shield Technique Used in the Aesthetic Zone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Variations in Soft and Hard Tissues following Immediate Implant Placement versus Delayed Implant Placement following Socket Preservation in the Maxillary Esthetic Region: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Evaluation of the Clinical Success of Immediate Loading Implant in the Aesthetic Zone: An In Vivo Study

Could the Socket Shield Technique Be Better Than Conventional Immediate Implantation? A Meta-Analysis.

Effectiveness of immediate implant placement into defective sockets in the esthetic zone: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Comparing the modified socket‐shield technique with the conventional immediate implantation technique in the anterior dentition: A 5‐year retrospective clinical study