Comparing Bone Alteration and Aesthetic Recovery Between the Socket-Shield Technique and the Conventional Immediate Implant Technique: A Retrospective Study

Xingfu Li,Nanxin Liu,Xinhan Li,Gang Fu,Hong Huang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.10833
2024-02-23
The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
Abstract:PURPOSE: To evaluate bone preservation and aesthetic recovery between the socketshield technique (SST) with different labial bone plate thicknesses and the conventional immediate implant technique (CIIT).MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent immediate implant placement in the anterior region were divided into three groups: the SST with a thick-wall phenotype (> 1 mm) (SSTA group), the SST with a thin-wall phenotype (< 1 mm) (SSTB group) and the CIIT with a thick-wall phenotype (> 1 mm) (CIIT group). Radiological images and clinical photos were collected before surgery and immediately and six months postoperatively. The labial bone width and labial bone width change (BWC), labial bone volume change (BVC), pink aesthetic score (PES) and complication rate were evaluated among the three groups. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software.RESULTS: Twenty people in each group (60 people total) were enrolled in this six-month retrospective study. The BWC in the SSTA group (0.22-0.30 mm) and the SSTB group (0.18-0.33 mm) was less than that in the CIIT group (0.61-0.80 mm, p<0.004). The SSTA group and the SSTB group had a lower BVC (24.08 vs. 21.14 vs. 54.81, p=0.004) and greater PES (11.75 vs. 11.65 vs. 10.65, p=0.009) than the CIIT group. No complications occurred among these patients.CONCLUSIONS: With the limitations of this study, we can conclude that the SST is a reliable method for preserving bone and achieving satisfactory aesthetic outcomes. The labial bone plate phenotype associated with the SST has minimal impact on both clinical and radiological outcomes.
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?