Abstract:Background: It is unclear whether an intact buccal bony plate is a prerequisite for immediate implant placement in postextraction sockets. The aim of this 10-year randomized controlled trial was to compare peri-implant soft and hard tissue parameters, esthetic ratings of, and patient-reported satisfaction with immediate implant placement in postextraction sockets with buccal bony defects ≥5 mm in the esthetic zone versus delayed implant placement after alveolar ridge preservation. Methods: Patients presenting a failing tooth in the esthetic region and a buccal bony defect ≥5 mm after an extraction were randomly assigned to immediate (Immediate Group, n = 20) or delayed (Delayed Group, n = 20) implant placement. The second-stage surgery and provisional restoration placement occurred 3 months after implant placement in both groups, followed by definitive restorations 3 months thereafter. During a 10-year follow-up period, marginal bone levels (primary outcome), buccal bone thickness, soft tissue parameters, esthetics, and patient-reported satisfaction were recorded. Results: The mean marginal bone level change was -0.71 ± 0.59 mm and -0.36 ± 0.39 mm in the Immediate Group and the Delayed Group after 10 years (p = 0.063), respectively. The secondary outcomes were not significantly different between both groups. Conclusions: Marginal bone level changes, buccal bone thickness, clinical outcomes, esthetics, and patients' satisfaction following immediate implant placement, in combination with bone augmentation in postextraction sockets with buccal bony defects ≥5 mm, were not statistically different to those following delayed implant placement after ridge preservation in the esthetic zone. Plain language summary: Immediate implant placement in case of a failing tooth is a favorable treatment option for patients because it considerably shortens treatment time and the number of surgical treatments. The question is if an intact buccal bone wall is necessary for immediate implant placement. A 10-year study was performed in which 20 patients with a failing tooth in the frontal region of the upper jaw were treated with immediate implant placement and were compared with 20 patients in whom a more conventional treatment strategy was followed in which the failing tooth was first removed and the bone gap restored and the implant placed in a second step. After a 10-year follow-up period, it appeared that the bone around the implant was very stable, gums were healthy, and patients were very satisfied with the result. There was no difference between the two treatment procedures. Such results mean that professionals can discuss the procedure with the patient and apply the individual's preference.

Immediate implant placement with platelet rich fibrin as space filling material versus deproteinized bovine bone in maxillary premolars: A randomized clinical trial

The efficiency of using advanced platelet rich fibrin–Autogenous bone graft mixture around immediately placed dental implants in mandibular molar region: (Randomized controlled clinical trial)

Retrospective Radiological and Clinical Study

Quantification of growth factors in advanced platelet-rich fibrin and concentrated growth factors and their clinical efficiency as adjunctive to the GTR procedure in periodontal intrabony defects

Immediate Implant Placement with Simultaneous Bone Augmentation Versus Delayed Implant Placement Following Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Clinical and Radiographic Study.

Immediate implant placement with immediate or delayed provisionalization in the maxillary aesthetic zone: A 10‐year randomized trial

Socket shield technique versus sticky bone in immediate dental implant in esthetic zone

Immediate implant and socket preservation using sticky bone and leukocyte-platelet-rich fibrin in the anterior maxilla: A 3-year case report

Evaluation of soft tissue and labial plate of bone stability with immediate implant in direct contact versus gap with socket shield: A randomized clinical trial with 1 year follow-up

Esthetic Evaluation of Maxillary Anterior Immediate Implant with Provisionalization with or without Bone Grafting

Comparison of the Photofunctionalization and Platelet-Rich Plasma in the Immediate Implants

Immediate single-tooth implant placement in bony defect sites: A 10-year randomized controlled trial

Clinical and histological evaluation of postextraction platelet-rich fibrin socket filling: a prospective randomized controlled study

A clinical and radiographic study of implants placed in autogenous bone grafts covered by either a platelet-rich fibrin membrane or deproteinised bovine bone mineral and a collagen membrane: a pilot randomised controlled clinical trial with a 2-year follow-up

Bone Regeneration Around Immediate Placed Implant Of Molar Teeth With Autologous Platelet-Rich Fibrin Two Case Reports

Evaluation of Alveolar Ridge Dimensions by Socket Preservation Therapy Using a Bone Graft and Platelet-Rich Fibrin: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Assessment of vertical ridge augmentation and marginal bone loss using autogenous onlay vs inlay grafting techniques with simultaneous implant placement in the anterior maxillary esthetic zone: A randomized clinical trial

Single immediate implant placement in the maxillary aesthetic zone with and without connective tissue grafting: Results of a 5‐year randomized controlled trial

Effect of different platelet-rich fibrin matrices for ridge preservation in multiple tooth extractions: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial

Flapless Immediate Implant Placement into Fresh Molar Extraction Socket Using Platelet-Rich Fibrin: A Case Report

Comparative Study of Autogenous Fresh Tooth Graft and Platelet Rich Fibrin Mixture versus Autogenous Fresh Tooth Graft Only For Immediate Dental Implant Placement