Abstract:figure legend The ulnar nerve was stimulated transcutaneously with conventional (conv) pulsed currents and burst‐modulated currents with carrier frequencies of 5 and 10 kHz. All three waveforms were matched for total phase charge. Both burst‐modulated currents shifted the recruitment curves for the muscle response from adductor digiti mini and sensory response from digital nerves to the right compared to conventional pulsed currents. As a result, burst‐modulated currents require more current to produce a maximal muscle response. However, despite the differences in current amplitude at the maximal muscle response, there was no difference in pain ratings between the three stimulus waveforms. Participants tolerated higher current amplitudes with burst‐modulated currents than conventional pulsed currents, but not when pain tolerance was normalised to the current amplitude at the maximal muscle response for each stimulus waveform. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation with repetitive bursts of a kilohertz carrier frequency is thought to be less painful than conventional pulsed currents by reducing the sensitivity of pain receptors. However, no purported benefit has been shown unequivocally. We compared the effects of carrier‐frequency stimulation and conventional stimulation on pain tolerance and the thresholds for sensory and motor axons in twelve participants. The ulnar nerve was stimulated transcutaneously with a conventional single pulse and 5 and 10 kHz carrier‐frequency waveforms that had 5 and 10 pulses, respectively, when delivered in bursts of ∼1 ms duration. Phase durations were adjusted across waveform types to match the total charge for a given current amplitude. Single bursts of stimulation were delivered from 1 mA up until no longer tolerable. This was repeated with repetitive bursts of stimulation at 20 Hz for 1 s. Participants tolerated higher current amplitudes with both carrier‐frequency waveforms than conventional stimulation, with repetitive bursts more painful than single bursts. However, compared to conventional stimulation, carrier‐frequency waveforms required more current to produce sensory and motor‐threshold responses and to obtain a maximal motor response (Mmax). When the current at pain tolerance was normalised to the current at Mmax, participants tolerated lower stimulus intensities with carrier‐frequency waveforms than conventional stimulation. These findings indicate that there is little to no benefit in using carrier‐frequency waveforms to minimise the discomfort from electrical stimulation as the increase in stimulus intensity at pain tolerance is more than offset by reduced effectiveness in the activation of sensory and motor axons. Key points Transcutaneous electrical stimulation with repetitive bursts of a kilohertz carrier‐frequency waveform is thought to be less painful than conventional pulsed currents. For ulnar nerve stimulation, when stimulus waveforms were matched for total phase charge, participants tolerated higher current amplitudes with carrier‐frequency stimulation than conventional stimulation. However, compared to conventional stimulation, carrier‐frequency waveforms required more current to produce a threshold response in both sensory and motor axons and to produce a maximal motor response (Mmax). When current at pain tolerance was normalised to current at Mmax, participants tolerated lower stimulus intensities with carrier‐frequency waveforms than conventional stimulation. Carrier‐frequency waveforms provide little to no benefit in minimising the discomfort from transcutaneous electrical stimulation as the increase in stimulus intensity at pain tolerance is more than offset by reduced effectiveness in activating sensory and motor axons.

Pain tolerance and the thresholds of human sensory and motor axons to single and repetitive bursts of kilohertz‐frequency stimulation

Prolonged Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation to Demonstrate a Larger Analgesia As Well As Cortical Excitability Changes Dependent on the Context of a Pain Episode

Unaltered Responses of Distal Motor Neurons to Non-Targeted Thoracic Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Pain Patients

Differential Modulation of Nociceptive Neural Responses in Medial and Lateral Pain Pathways by Peripheral Electrical Stimulation: a Multichannel Recording Study.

Muscle contractions and pain sensation accompanying high-frequency electroporation pulses

Biophysics of Frequency-Dependent Variation in Paresthesia and Pain Relief during Spinal Cord Stimulation

Model-based analysis of subthreshold mechanisms of spinal cord stimulation for pain

COMPARISON OF LONG-TERM POTENTIATION-LIKE PAIN SENSITIZATION INDUCED BY ELECTRICAL STIMULATION IN DIFFERENT FREQUENCIES

A back-translational study of descending interactions with the induction of hyperalgesia by high-frequency electrical stimulation in rat and human

Effect of percutaneous electrical stimulation with high-frequency alternating currents at 30 kHz on the sensory-motor system

Spinal Cord Stimulation: Comparing Traditional Low-frequency Tonic Waveforms to Novel High Frequency and Burst Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain

Modulation of pain perception through transcranial alternating current stimulation and its nonlinear relationship with the simulated electric field magnitude

Does high-frequency stimulation of sensory axons break the causal link between pain relief and paresthesia?

Peripheral direct current reduces naturally evoked nociceptive activity at the spinal cord in rodent models of pain

Comparison Between Therapeutic Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with the Frequency of 2 Hz and 100 Hz on Chronic Inflammatory Pain in Rats

Neurobiological mechanisms of TENS-induced analgesia

Burst and high frequency stimulation: underlying mechanism of action

There is no Biophysical Distinction between Temporal Interference Stimulation and Direct kHz Stimulation for Actuation of Peripheral Nerves

Effect of Percutaneous Electric Stimulation with High-Frequency Alternating Currents on the Sensory-Motor System of Healthy Volunteers: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Study

Fundamental limitations of kilohertz-frequency carriers in afferent fiber recruitment with transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation

Brain correlates of short-term habituation to repetitive electrical noxious stimulation