Abstract:figure legend The ulnar nerve was stimulated transcutaneously with conventional (conv) pulsed currents and burst‐modulated currents with carrier frequencies of 5 and 10 kHz. All three waveforms were matched for total phase charge. Both burst‐modulated currents shifted the recruitment curves for the muscle response from adductor digiti mini and sensory response from digital nerves to the right compared to conventional pulsed currents. As a result, burst‐modulated currents require more current to produce a maximal muscle response. However, despite the differences in current amplitude at the maximal muscle response, there was no difference in pain ratings between the three stimulus waveforms. Participants tolerated higher current amplitudes with burst‐modulated currents than conventional pulsed currents, but not when pain tolerance was normalised to the current amplitude at the maximal muscle response for each stimulus waveform. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation with repetitive bursts of a kilohertz carrier frequency is thought to be less painful than conventional pulsed currents by reducing the sensitivity of pain receptors. However, no purported benefit has been shown unequivocally. We compared the effects of carrier‐frequency stimulation and conventional stimulation on pain tolerance and the thresholds for sensory and motor axons in twelve participants. The ulnar nerve was stimulated transcutaneously with a conventional single pulse and 5 and 10 kHz carrier‐frequency waveforms that had 5 and 10 pulses, respectively, when delivered in bursts of ∼1 ms duration. Phase durations were adjusted across waveform types to match the total charge for a given current amplitude. Single bursts of stimulation were delivered from 1 mA up until no longer tolerable. This was repeated with repetitive bursts of stimulation at 20 Hz for 1 s. Participants tolerated higher current amplitudes with both carrier‐frequency waveforms than conventional stimulation, with repetitive bursts more painful than single bursts. However, compared to conventional stimulation, carrier‐frequency waveforms required more current to produce sensory and motor‐threshold responses and to obtain a maximal motor response (Mmax). When the current at pain tolerance was normalised to the current at Mmax, participants tolerated lower stimulus intensities with carrier‐frequency waveforms than conventional stimulation. These findings indicate that there is little to no benefit in using carrier‐frequency waveforms to minimise the discomfort from electrical stimulation as the increase in stimulus intensity at pain tolerance is more than offset by reduced effectiveness in the activation of sensory and motor axons. Key points Transcutaneous electrical stimulation with repetitive bursts of a kilohertz carrier‐frequency waveform is thought to be less painful than conventional pulsed currents. For ulnar nerve stimulation, when stimulus waveforms were matched for total phase charge, participants tolerated higher current amplitudes with carrier‐frequency stimulation than conventional stimulation. However, compared to conventional stimulation, carrier‐frequency waveforms required more current to produce a threshold response in both sensory and motor axons and to produce a maximal motor response (Mmax). When current at pain tolerance was normalised to current at Mmax, participants tolerated lower stimulus intensities with carrier‐frequency waveforms than conventional stimulation. Carrier‐frequency waveforms provide little to no benefit in minimising the discomfort from transcutaneous electrical stimulation as the increase in stimulus intensity at pain tolerance is more than offset by reduced effectiveness in activating sensory and motor axons.

Does high-frequency stimulation of sensory axons break the causal link between pain relief and paresthesia?

Enhancing Excitatory Activity of Somatosensory Cortex Alleviates Neuropathic Pain Through Regulating Homeostatic Plasticity

Biophysics of Frequency-Dependent Variation in Paresthesia and Pain Relief during Spinal Cord Stimulation

Model-based analysis of subthreshold mechanisms of spinal cord stimulation for pain

Differential Modulation of Nociceptive Neural Responses in Medial and Lateral Pain Pathways by Peripheral Electrical Stimulation: a Multichannel Recording Study.

A translational approach for understanding hyperalgesia: What has the high-frequency electrical stimulation model taught us?

A back-translational study of descending interactions with the induction of hyperalgesia by high-frequency electrical stimulation in rat and human

Conventional and kilohertz-frequency spinal cord stimulation produces intensity- and frequency-dependent inhibition of mechanical hypersensitivity in a rat model of neuropathic pain.

The Impact of Electrical Charge Delivery on Inhibition of Mechanical Hypersensitivity in Nerve-Injured Rats by Sub-Sensory Threshold Spinal Cord Stimulation

Intraspinal microstimulation of the ventral horn has therapeutically relevant cross-modal effects on nociception

Burst and high frequency stimulation: underlying mechanism of action

Contribution of afferent pathways to nerve injury-induced spontaneous pain and evoked hypersensitivity

Synaptic sensitization in the anterior cingulate cortex sustains the consciousness of pain via synchronized oscillating electromagnetic waves

High‐Frequency Spinal Stimulation Suppresses Microglial Kaiso‐P2X7 Receptor Axis‐Induced Inflammation to Alleviate Neuropathic Pain in Rats

Endocannabinoid Activation of Cb1 Receptors Contributes to Long-Lasting Reversal of Neuropathic Pain by Repetitive Spinal Cord Stimulation

Pain tolerance and the thresholds of human sensory and motor axons to single and repetitive bursts of kilohertz‐frequency stimulation

Brain activity changes after high/low frequency stimulation in a nonhuman primate model of central post-stroke pain

Changes in Long-Term Synaptic Plasticity in the Spinal Dorsal Horn of Neuropathic Pain Rats

Was it a pain or a sound? Across-species variability in sensory sensitivity.

Neurobiological mechanisms of TENS-induced analgesia

Low-frequency (5-Hz) stimulation of ventrolateral periaqueductal gray modulates the descending serotonergic system in the peripheral neuropathic pain