Abstract:figure legend The ulnar nerve was stimulated transcutaneously with conventional (conv) pulsed currents and burst‐modulated currents with carrier frequencies of 5 and 10 kHz. All three waveforms were matched for total phase charge. Both burst‐modulated currents shifted the recruitment curves for the muscle response from adductor digiti mini and sensory response from digital nerves to the right compared to conventional pulsed currents. As a result, burst‐modulated currents require more current to produce a maximal muscle response. However, despite the differences in current amplitude at the maximal muscle response, there was no difference in pain ratings between the three stimulus waveforms. Participants tolerated higher current amplitudes with burst‐modulated currents than conventional pulsed currents, but not when pain tolerance was normalised to the current amplitude at the maximal muscle response for each stimulus waveform. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation with repetitive bursts of a kilohertz carrier frequency is thought to be less painful than conventional pulsed currents by reducing the sensitivity of pain receptors. However, no purported benefit has been shown unequivocally. We compared the effects of carrier‐frequency stimulation and conventional stimulation on pain tolerance and the thresholds for sensory and motor axons in twelve participants. The ulnar nerve was stimulated transcutaneously with a conventional single pulse and 5 and 10 kHz carrier‐frequency waveforms that had 5 and 10 pulses, respectively, when delivered in bursts of ∼1 ms duration. Phase durations were adjusted across waveform types to match the total charge for a given current amplitude. Single bursts of stimulation were delivered from 1 mA up until no longer tolerable. This was repeated with repetitive bursts of stimulation at 20 Hz for 1 s. Participants tolerated higher current amplitudes with both carrier‐frequency waveforms than conventional stimulation, with repetitive bursts more painful than single bursts. However, compared to conventional stimulation, carrier‐frequency waveforms required more current to produce sensory and motor‐threshold responses and to obtain a maximal motor response (Mmax). When the current at pain tolerance was normalised to the current at Mmax, participants tolerated lower stimulus intensities with carrier‐frequency waveforms than conventional stimulation. These findings indicate that there is little to no benefit in using carrier‐frequency waveforms to minimise the discomfort from electrical stimulation as the increase in stimulus intensity at pain tolerance is more than offset by reduced effectiveness in the activation of sensory and motor axons. Key points Transcutaneous electrical stimulation with repetitive bursts of a kilohertz carrier‐frequency waveform is thought to be less painful than conventional pulsed currents. For ulnar nerve stimulation, when stimulus waveforms were matched for total phase charge, participants tolerated higher current amplitudes with carrier‐frequency stimulation than conventional stimulation. However, compared to conventional stimulation, carrier‐frequency waveforms required more current to produce a threshold response in both sensory and motor axons and to produce a maximal motor response (Mmax). When current at pain tolerance was normalised to current at Mmax, participants tolerated lower stimulus intensities with carrier‐frequency waveforms than conventional stimulation. Carrier‐frequency waveforms provide little to no benefit in minimising the discomfort from transcutaneous electrical stimulation as the increase in stimulus intensity at pain tolerance is more than offset by reduced effectiveness in activating sensory and motor axons.

COMPARISON OF LONG-TERM POTENTIATION-LIKE PAIN SENSITIZATION INDUCED BY ELECTRICAL STIMULATION IN DIFFERENT FREQUENCIES

Prolonged Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation to Demonstrate a Larger Analgesia As Well As Cortical Excitability Changes Dependent on the Context of a Pain Episode

Differential Modulation of Nociceptive Neural Responses in Medial and Lateral Pain Pathways by Peripheral Electrical Stimulation: a Multichannel Recording Study.

Comparison Between Therapeutic Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation with the Frequency of 2 Hz and 100 Hz on Chronic Inflammatory Pain in Rats

The Impact of Electrical Charge Delivery on Inhibition of Mechanical Hypersensitivity in Nerve-Injured Rats by Sub-Sensory Threshold Spinal Cord Stimulation

Long-term bilateral change in pain and sensitivity to high-frequency cutaneous electrical stimulation in healthy subjects depends on stimulus modality: a dermatomal examination

The Effect of Electrical Stimulation–Induced Pain on Time Perception and Relationships to Pain-Related Emotional and Cognitive Factors: A Temporal Bisection Task and Questionnaire–Based Study

Relations Between Brain Network Activation and Analgesic Effect Induced by Low Vs. High Frequency Electrical Acupoint Stimulation in Different Subjects: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

Modulation of Pain Signal Processing by Electric Acupoint Stimulation: an Electroencephalogram Study.

Comparison of Analgesic Effects of Electroacupuncture at Different Stimulating Intensities and Different Treatment Intervals

Application of Electrical Stimulation in Pain Study by Fmri

A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Human Brain in Pain-Related Areas Induced by Electrical Stimulation with Different Intensities.

Comparison of the Antinociceptive Effects Induced by Electroacupuncture and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in the Rat.

Pain tolerance and the thresholds of human sensory and motor axons to single and repetitive bursts of kilohertz‐frequency stimulation

Electroencephalographic power ratio and peak frequency difference associate with central sensitization in chronic pain

Neurobiological mechanisms of TENS-induced analgesia

Prolonged Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation Can Regulate Sensitivity on Aβ Fibers: an Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study.

[Effect of Electroacupuncture with Different Frequencies on Neuropathic Pain in a Rat Model].

Effect of neuromorphic transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (nTENS) of cortical functional networks on tactile perceptions: an event-related electroencephalogram study

Suppression of Neuropathic Pain by Peripheral Electrical Stimulation in Rats: Μ-Opioid Receptor and NMDA Receptor Implicated

Electrical Stimulation-Induced SSSEP As an Objective Index to Evaluate the Difference of Tactile Acuity Between the Left and Right Hand.