Abstract:Optical full-field measurement methods such as Digital Image Correlation (DIC) are currently extensively applied to study the deformation characteristics of a wide range of materials. The measured displacement and strain fields, however, should always be interpreted in view of the obtained resolution (noise floor) and spatial resolution. Indeed, local (or subset-based) approaches heavily rely on the adopted regularization settings (subset size, step and strain smoothing kernel) whereas global algorithms are influenced by the applied mesh to a large extent. In this contribution, the aim is to present a methodology to objectively compare both approaches in terms of resolution and spatial resolution. Finally, a comparison will be made to a novel adaptive global DIC approach that is less dependent on the initial user input. Introduction Digital Image Correlation (DIC) is gradually becoming a standard tool in experimental mechanics, for both industry and academia. Results of the measurement technique, however, are mostly used qualitatively (detect hotspots, check boundary conditions, visualize some deformation phenomena), but there are still only very few examples of quantitative use of such measurements (to validate models or identify constitutive behaviour etc.) This is due to the fact that current implementations of DIC are highly dependent on the initial user input. Indeed, a subdivision of DIC algorithms is usually made in terms of local [1] and global [2] DIC. Local DIC, or subset-based DIC, heavily relies on the adopted subset, step and eventual strain smoothing kernel [3,4]. Global DIC, on the other hand, is highly influenced by the mesh density. Generally, for both methods a trade-off between resolution (noise-floor) and spatial resolution must be made. Indeed, as indicated in Fig. 1, a higher subset size , e.g. will largely decrease the noise-floor of a strain measurement since more smoothing is adopted, at the expect however of a decreased spatial resolution. The example shown is the result of an uni-axial tensile test on a 5-harness satin weave carbon/PPS thermoplastic composite where specific stress concentrations occur at the cross-over points (where warp and weft yarns are interlacing) [5]. Equivalently, larger element sizes will have an equivalent effect. It is, however, not clear yet how both methodologies can be mutually compared in terms of resolution vs. spatial resolution performance. Simply considering the same element and subset dimensions is much too drastic since the nodal values of the element are interconnected by its neighbouring elements. Fig. 1: Impact of subset size on strain noise floor and spatial resolution. In this contribution a more honest comparison will be performed based on the reconstruction of a sinusoidal wave at various frequencies. A comparison will be made to a novel adaptive global DIC approach [6]. It is important to stress that the algorithmic comparison is pure, since all the compared methodologies are implemented on the same platform, relying on identical interpolators and image processing. Only the correlation part differs. The purpose of this presentation is to make people aware that DIC data must be treated with care and additionally to invoke a discussion on global and local DIC methodologies. Results are still preliminary and accordingly cannot yet be published in this abstract.

Architecture-Driven Digital Volume Correlation: Application to the Analysis of In-Situ Crushing of a Polyurethane Foam

A Digital Volume Correlation Technique for 3-D Deformation Measurements of Soft Gels

Projection-based measurement and identification

Digital Image Correlation: From Displacement Measurement to Identification of Elastic Properties - A Review

"Subvolume Splitting" DVC applied for accurate discontinuous deformation measurement and fracture parameter extraction

Sensitivity Study Using Synthetic 3D Image Datasets to Investigate the Effect of Noise Artefacts on Digital Volume Correlation

Digital image correlation analyses of masonry infilled frame: Uncertainty-based mesh refinement and damage quantification

Quantitative characterization of deformation and damage process by digital volume correlation: A review

A Self-Correcting Strategy of the Digital Volume Correlation Displacement Field Based on Image Matching: Application to Poor Speckles Quality and Complex-Large Deformation

Automated reconstruction and conformal discretization of 3D woven composite CT scans with local fiber volume fraction control

Measurement of three-dimensional volumetric displacement fields in structural porous adhesive joints, under tensile and tensile-shear load, by means of in-situ X-ray microtomography

Digital Image Correlation used to Analyze the Multiaxial Behavior of Rubber-like Materials

Quantification of resolution and spatial resolution in local and global DIC

Multiscale Damage Analyses of Red Sandstone in Uniaxial Compression Based on Advanced Digital Volume Correlation

Two-Dimensional Meshfree-Based Digital Image Correlation for Strain-Displacement Measurement

Digital Speckle Correlation and its Applications

Computer Vision based Tomography of Structures Using 3D Digital Image Correlation

Dynamic digital image correlation method for rolling convective contact

Assessment of digital image correlation vibrometry in the presence of thermal flow disturbance

Quantification of localised strains induced within a granular medium by a biphasic flow via digital image correlation

Digital Image Correlation Method for the Analysis of 3-D Internal Displacement Field in Object