Abstract:Objective: We conducted a meta-analysis to examine whether numeric decision-making in law is susceptible to the effect of (possibly arbitrary) values present in the decision contexts (anchoring effect) and to investigate which factors might moderate this effect. Hypotheses: We predicted that the presence of numeric anchors would bias legal decision-makers' judgment in the direction of the anchor value. We hypothesized that the effect size of anchoring would be moderated by several variables, which we grouped into three categories: methodological (type of stimuli; type of sample), psychological (standard vs. basic paradigm; anchor value; type of scale on which the participants assessed the target value), and legal (relevance of the anchor; type of the anchor; area of law to which the presented case belonged; presence of any salient numeric values other than the main anchor). Method: Twenty-nine studies (93 effect sizes; N = 8,549) met the inclusion criteria. We divided them into two groups, depending on whether they included a control group, and calculated the overall effect size using a random-effects Model with robust variance estimation. We assessed the influence of moderators using random effects metaregression. Results: The overall effect sizes of anchoring for studies with a control group (z = .27, 95% CI [.21, .33], d = .58, 95% CI [.44, .73]) and without a control group (z = .39, 95% CI [.31, .47], d = .91, 95% CI [.69, 1.12]) were both significant, although we provide some evidence of possible publication bias. We found preliminary evidence of a potential moderating effect of some legally relevant factors, such as legal expertise or the anchor relevance. Conclusions: Existing research indicates anchoring effects exist in legal contexts. The influence of anchors seems to depend on some situational factors, which paves the way for future research on countering the problematic effect in legal settings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)

The influence of anchoring on the uncertainty effect

A Further Exploration of the Uncertainty Effect

Rational Anchoring in Economic Valuations

“Bayesian anchoring” and the fourfold pattern of risk attitudes

"Bayesian anchoring" and the fourfold pattern of risk attitudes

The Quantum Model of Anchoring Effect in Cognitive Decision Making

Anchoring Bias in Online Voting

Are decisions under risk malleable?

Reference dependence, expectations and anchoring in the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak mechanism

Probabilistic Outcomes Are Valued Less in Expectation, Even Conditional on Their Realization

Anchors As Semantic Primes in Value Construction: an Eeg Study of the Anchoring Effect

Fooling with facts: Quantifying anchoring bias through a large-scale online experiment

Extreme Outcomes Accentuate Overweighting of Low Probabilities and Underweighting of High Probabilities in Experience‐Based Choice

Anchoring under Currency Substitution: A Ratchet Price Mechanism in the Housing Market

Detecting anchoring in financial markets

Anchoring effect in legal decision-making: A meta-analysis.

An experimental test on the hypothesis of strategic uncertainty

The Ending Effect in the Domain of Gambling: The Effect of Gain-Loss Status on Economic Decision-Making

The Impact of Anchoring Effects, Loss Aversion, and Belief Perseverance on Consumer Decision-Making

The nature of anchor-biased estimates and its application to the wisdom of crowds

Uncertainty-modulated attentional capture: Outcome variance increases attentional priority.