Abstract:The rapid advances of science and technology have provided a large part of the world with all conceivable needs and comfort. However, this welfare comes with serious threats to the planet and many of its inhabitants. An enormous amount of scientific evidence points at global warming, mass destruction of bio-diversity, scarce resources, health risks, and pollution all over the world. These facts are generally acknowledged nowadays, not only by scientists, but also by the majority of politicians and citizens. Nevertheless, this understanding has caused insufficient changes in our decision making and behavior to preserve our natural resources and to prevent upcoming (natural) disasters. In the present study, we try to explain how systematic tendencies or distortions in human judgment and decision-making, known as "cognitive biases," contribute to this situation. A large body of literature shows how cognitive biases affect the outcome of our deliberations. In natural and primordial situations, they may lead to quick, practical, and satisfying decisions, but these decisions may be poor and risky in a broad range of modern, complex, and long-term challenges, like climate change or pandemic prevention. We first briefly present the social-psychological characteristics that are inherent to (or typical for) most sustainability issues. These are: experiential vagueness, long-term effects, complexity and uncertainty, threat of the status quo, threat of social status, personal vs. community interest, and group pressure. For each of these characteristics, we describe how this relates to cognitive biases, from a neuro-evolutionary point of view, and how these evolved biases may affect sustainable choices or behaviors of people. Finally, based on this knowledge, we describe influence techniques (interventions, nudges, incentives) to mitigate or capitalize on these biases in order to foster more sustainable choices and behaviors.

The Impact of Anchoring Effects, Loss Aversion, and Belief Perseverance on Consumer Decision-Making

Cognitive Antecedents of Family Business Bias in Investment Decisions: A Commentary on “risky Decisions and the Family Firm Bias: an Experimental Study Based on Prospect Theory”

An Experimental Study on the Influence of the Expenditure of Cognitive Resource on Framing Effect

The Review of Anchoring Effect Which Is One of Individual Decision-Making Bias Under Uncertainty

Selling Creates A Loss While Buying Generates A Gain: Capturing the Implicit Irrational Bias by the Iat Method

Asserting Your Mind: Interruptions Extremize Consumer Choices

Fooling with facts: Quantifying anchoring bias through a large-scale online experiment

PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS AFFECTING INVESTORS DECISION MAKING

Influences of mental accounting on consumption decisions: asymmetric effect of a scarcity mindset

The Impact of Heuristics Bias on Investment Decision: An Empirical Study

Information Cherry-Picking: when Confirmation Bias Met Anchoring Bias

The feeling of throwing good money after bad: The role of affective reaction in the sunk-cost fallacy

Statistical study on the impact of psychological bias on business decision-making

Multifactorial Effects on Bounded Rational Decision-Making

Mitigating the Influence of Preference-Oriented Negative Electronic Word-of-mouth: Investigating the Role of Consumers’ Cognition Regarding Preference Heterogeneity

Cognitive bias and how to improve sustainable decision making

Over-representation of Extreme Events in Decision-Making: A Rational Metacognitive Account

Bounded Rationality, Anchoring-and-adjustment Sentiment, and Asset Pricing

Sunk Cost Effects Hinge on the Neural Recalibration of Reference Points in Mental Accounting

Impact of Cognitive Bias on Improvised Decision-Makers’ Risk Behavior: an Analysis Based on the Mediating Effect of Expected Revenue and Risk Perception

"Every Coin Has Two Sides": the Effects of Dialectical Thinking and Attitudinal Ambivalence on Psychological Discomfort and Consumer Choice