The “value added” of neurocognitive testing after sports-related concussion

Derk A Van Kampen, Mark R Lovell, Jamie E Pardini, Michael W Collins, Freddie H Fu
2006-10-01
Abstract:BackgroundNeurocognitive testing has been endorsed as a “cornerstone’ of concussion management by recent Vienna and Prague meetings of the Concussion in Sport Group. Neurocognitive testing is important given the potential unreliability of athlete self-report after injury. Relying only on athletes'ormalities after injury.Study DesignCase control study; Level of evidence, 3.MethodsHigh school and college athletes with a diagnosed concussion were tested 2 days after injury. Postinjury neurocognitive performance (Immediate Postconcussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing) and symptom (postconcussion symptom) scores were compared with preinjury (baseline) scores and with those of an agex and education-matched noninjured athlete control group. “Abnormal” test performance was determined statistically with Reliable Change Index scores.ResultsSixty-four percent of concussed athletes reported a …
What problem does this paper attempt to address?