Comparison of Urban versus Industry Normative Values of Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACTTM)

Tamerah N. Hunt,Megan Byrd
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21030247
IF: 4.614
2024-02-22
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Abstract:Concussion baseline testing has been advocated for the assessment of pre-morbid function. When individual baseline scores are unavailable, utilizing normative values is recommended. However, the validity of generalizing normative data across multiple socioeconomic environments is unknown. Objective: mimic the normative data creation of ImPACTTM to examine the effect of socioeconomic status (SES) on ImPACTTM composite scores. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional design analyzed completed computerized neuropsychological test data (ImPACTTM) obtained to establish the baseline scores of cognitive function from males aged 13–15 years (n = 300) and 16–18 years (n = 331) from an urban high school system. Comparisons between baseline scores and normative ImPACTTM values were calculated utilizing t-tests with ImPACTTM composite scores serving as dependent variables. Results: significant differences between age-dependent urban composite scores and ImPACTTM normative values for 13–15- and 16–18-year-olds were found for Composite Verbal Memory, Composite Visual Memory, Composite Motor and Composite Reaction Time (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Significant differences exist between urban high school athletes and ImPACTTM-provided age-dependent normative scores, with urban participants performing below age-dependent normative values. These findings support establishing SES appropriate normative values when baseline test scores are not available for direct comparison in order to provide better evaluation and post-concussion management across diverse populations.
public, environmental & occupational health,environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?