A - 35 Subjective and Objective Cognitive Functioning Differences among University Athletes

J Hansen,M Mrazik,C David,Q Ree-Fedun,R Wagner,R White,D Naidu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae052.35

2024-07-06

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

Abstract:Abstract Purpose To investigate the differences between objective cognitive scores and self-reported cognitive symptoms among university athletes. Method A prospective, quasi-experimental design was used for the study. Participants included athletes from a Canadian university over consecutive seasons who were diagnosed with a Sports Related Concussion (SRC) and underwent a post-injury assessment within 24–48 hours. Nineteen male and female athletes (ages M = 25.11, SD = 3.63) with complete data from the Sideline Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT-5) were included. An independent T-test and correlational analysis were used to evaluate the relationship between subjective symptoms (memory and concentration) and objective cognitive functioning. Results There were no significant differences between baseline and post-injury testing on SCAT-5’s learning, concentration and delayed recall tests (p > 0.05) but significant differences between baseline and post-injury symptom report of concentration t(36) = −3.4, p < 0.001 and memory t(36) = −3.0, p < 0.001. At baseline, there was a significant negative correlation between memory total score and the reported cognitive symptoms, (r = −0.61, p < 0.05) and between total cognitive score and self-reported symptom report (r = −61, p < 0.05). In contrast, at post-injury, there were no significant correlations between the memory total score or total cognitive scores and the reported symptoms (r = 0.7, p = 0.79; r = 0.11, p = 0.67). Conclusions Participants endorse a significant increase in symptoms at post injury in spite of no significant changes in their cognitive performance. Psychological distress at injury may impact perceptions of cognitive difficulties.

psychology, clinical