A - 34 Differences in Symptom and Well-Being Report at Initial Post-Injury Concussion Medical Evaluations

D Naidu,M Mrazik,C V David,J Hansen,Q Ree-Fedun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae052.34
2024-07-06
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Abstract:Abstract Purpose To investigate differences in subjective symptom report and percentage ratings of subjective well-being (SWB) at initial post-injury concussion medical evaluations in professional football players. Method A retrospective, quasi-experimental design was used for the study. Participants included Canadian Football League players who underwent initial locker room post-injury medical evaluations. CFL concussion protocol requires any player suspected of a concussion to undergo a full evaluation including SCAT5. There were 2 groups including 43 players subsequently diagnosed with concussions who were compared with 22 players not diagnosed with concussion. Data included total symptom score from the SCAT5 and SWB (ratings out of 100%). T-tests and descriptive statistics evaluated differences between groups. Results At baseline, there were no significant differences on ratings of SWB between groups. In contrast, there was a significant difference in ratings of subjective well being between concussed players (M = 75.5%, SD = 19.5) and non concussed players (M = 92.7, SD = 7.7); t(63) = [3.8], p = [0.1]. Furthermore, significant differences on total symptom report from the SCAT5 were identified between concussed players (M = 16.9, SD = 15.4) and non concussed players (M = 3.5, SD = 5.7); t(63) - [3.9], p = [<0.01]. The sensitivity was 85% with a specificity of 63% using a post-injury SWB score of 75%. Conclusions Results indicated that at initial post-injury concussion evaluations, players subsequently diagnosed with concussion have lower SWB. Further research is needed to determine whether this metric would be helpful in the diagnosis of concussion.
psychology, clinical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?