An objective neurophysiological study of subconcussion in female and male high school student athletes

Ryan C.N. D’Arcy,David McCarthy,Derek Harrison,Zander Levenberg,Julian Wan,Aidan Hepburn,Eric D. Kirby,Tanja Yardley,Nikita Yamada-Bagg,Shaun D. Fickling,Thayne A. Munce,David W. Dodick,Christopher Ahmad,Ken Shubin Stein
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.20.24304610
2024-03-27
Abstract:Emerging evidence from neurophysiological brain vital sign studies show repeatable sensitivity to cumulative subconcussive impairments over a season of contact sports. The current study addressed the need for a large prospective study comparing a low-contact control group to high-contact group. Importantly, the study also expanded the scope of neurophysiological changes related to repetitive head impacts to include female athletes in addition to male athletes. In total, 89 high school student athletes underwent 231 brain vital sign scans over a full calendar year. The results replicated prior subconcussive cognitive impairments (N400 delays) and sensory impairments (N100 amplitude reductions) in male athletes and demonstrated similar subconcussive impairments for the first time in female athletes. While there was no significant subconcussive difference between female and male athletes, female athletes show overall larger responses in general. The findings demonstrated that subconcussive impairments are detectable in a controlled experimental comparison for both female and male high school athletes. The study highlights the opportunity to monitor subconcussive changes in cognitive processing for both female and male athletes to help advance prevention, mitigation and management efforts aimed at reducing athletes’ risk of potential long-term negative health outcomes related to cumulative exposure to repetitive head impacts.
Neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?