Abstract:Background: The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS-2.0) is a self-administered instrument to assess functional impairment. It is used in the general population as well as different patient groups. However, its application to patients with psychotic disorders may be hampered by disease-specific difficulties of self-estimation. This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the short (12-item) WHODAS-2.0 in a naturalistic sample of outpatients attending a psychosis clinic in Gothenburg, Sweden. Methods: Annual data from two outpatient clinics registered 2016-2019 were analyzed retrospectively. The assessment of the short WHODAS-2.0 was based on the first questionnaire completed by 881 patients. Confirmatory factor analysis evaluated previously validated models. Item convergent and discriminant validity as well as internal reliability were computed. Construct validity was assessed by comparing mean differences in accord with previous research regarding patients' characteristics associated with functioning such as advanced age, diagnosed comorbidities, antipsychotic treatment status, and symptom severity measured with PANSS-8 remission items. Results: A heterogeneous sample was obtained in terms of age (range: 20-92), various living situations, and different geographic areas of birth. Most patients (75%) had been diagnosed with psychotic disorders more than 10 years ago and the majority (89%) were on antipsychotic medication. We confirmed an adjusted two-level factor model with a single second-order disability factor and six first-order factors representing the six IFC dimensions. The WHODAS-2.0 sum score measuring general disability showed good reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89). Construct validity was confirmed as older patients, patients with comorbidities, and patients in assisted living had higher WHODAS-2.0 scores. Patients with no or mild psychotic symptoms had significantly lower WHODAS-2.0 sum scores than patients with more severe symptoms. Conclusions: The findings further validate the 12-item WHODAS-2.0 in a naturalistic sample of outpatients with psychotic disorders. This study corroborates the clinical significance of the short, 12-item WHODAS-2.0 by demonstrating consistent associations between patients' age, medical comorbidities, living situation, antipsychotic treatment status, and psychotic symptom severity.

Psychometric properties of the WHODAS 2.0 in patients with orthopedic injuries from road traffic crashes in Bangladesh

Psychometric properties of the 12-item WHODAS applied through phone survey: an experience in PERSIAN Traffic Cohort

Clinical validity of the 12-item WHODAS-2.0 in a naturalistic sample of outpatients with psychotic disorders

Disability, pain, and wound-specific concerns self-reported by adults at risk of limb loss: A cross-sectional study using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0

Factors associated with road traffic injury in a high-risk zone of Bangladesh: a mixed-method study

Measuring Disability Across Cultures — the Psychometric Properties of the WHODAS II in Older People from Seven Low‐ and Middle‐income Countries. the 10/66 Dementia Research Group Population‐based Survey

Crash severity analysis and risk factors identification based on an alternate data source: a case study of developing country

Functional impairment as a proxy measure indicating high rates of trauma exposure, post-migration living difficulties, common mental disorders, and poor health amongst Rohingya refugees in Malaysia

Exploring the Long-Term Disability Outcomes in Trauma Patients: Study Protocol

Assessing the Effectiveness of Rehabilitation Interventions through the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 on Disability—A Systematic Review

Quality of life of survivors following road traffic orthopaedic injuries in Rwanda

Exploring characteristics and severity of road traffic injuries in Lebanon using emergency department hospital-based data

Development of traditional Chinese version of World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 36--item (WHODAS 2.0) in Taiwan: validity and reliability analyses

Pattern of orthopedic injuries among Victims of Road Traffic Accidents in Aseer region, Saudi Arabia

Prevalence of musculoskeletal conditions and related disabilities in Bangladeshi adults: a cross-sectional national survey

Cross-cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Kurdish Version of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH-KU) Scale

Self-efficacy, disability level and physical strength in the injured workers: findings from a major factory disaster in Bangladesh

Cross-cultural adaptation, validation and psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire in office working population from Saudi Arabia

Demographic and clinical profile of an inception cohort of road trauma survivors

Validation of tele-assessment of disability and health after stroke using WHODAS 2.0 through video call in a middle-income country

Characteristics and Injury Patterns of Road Traffic Injuries in Urban and Rural Uganda—A Retrospective Medical Record Review Study in Two Hospitals