Abstract:BACKGROUND:Current guidelines recommend a 50 mm or greater compression depth for manual chest compression in adults. However, whether this uniform compression depth is a suitable requirement for mechanical CPR remains to be determined. We hypothesized that a relatively shallow compression depth (30 mm) would have similar hemodynamic efficacy but fewer complications versus the standard compression depth (50 mm) during mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with the miniaturized chest compressor (MCC) in a porcine model.METHODS:In the current study, we used a total of 16 domestic male pigs (38±2 kg). All pigs were exposed to 7 min of ventricular fibrillation (VF) followed by 5 min of CPR. Then the animals were randomly assigned to the shallow (30 mm) group and the standard (50 mm) group. At the second min of CPR, every pig was given epinephrine (20 µg/kg) through the femoral vein and repeated every 3 min. First defibrillation was delivered with a single 120 J shock at 5 min of CPR. Hemodynamics, carotid blood flow (CBF), end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2), coronary perfusion pressure (CPP), intrathoracic pressure (ITP) and arterial blood gas were measured. Rib fractures and lung injuries, as indicated by ground-glass opacification (GGO), as well as intense parenchymal opacification (IPO), were assessed and calculated by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) scan.RESULTS:We found no significant differences in CPP, CBF, or ETCO2 between the both groups throughout the CPR period. After administration of epinephrine, the CPP of all animals increased while ETCO2 and CBF decreased during CPR. A significantly lower intrathoracic positive pressure (ITPP) and systolic artery pressure (SAP) were measured in the shallow group at the first min of CPR. However, we didn't find remarkable differences in these values between the both groups for the next 4 min of CPR. All animals were successfully resuscitated. The shallow group had significantly lower IPO QCT scores compared with the standard group. We found no significant differences in GGO QCT scores after resuscitation between both groups.CONCLUSIONS:Relatively shallow compression depth has similar hemodynamic efficacy but fewer complications versus the standard compression depth.

Proportional Versus Fixed Chest Compression Depth for Guideline-Compliant Resuscitation of Infant Asphyxial Cardiac Arrest

Chest Compression Depth Targets in Critically Ill Infants and Children Measured With a Laser Distance Meter: Single-Center Retrospective Study From Japan, 2019–2022

Compression Depth of 30 Mm Has Similar Efficacy and Fewer Complications Versus 50 Mm During Mechanical Chest Compression with Miniaturized Chest Compressor in a Porcine Model of Cardiac Arrest

The optimal chest compression point on sternum based on chest-computed tomography: A retrospective study

Effects of varying chest compression depths on carotid blood flow and blood pressure in asphyxiated piglets

Assessment of optimal chest compression depth during neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomised controlled animal trial

Optimal Chest Compression Point During Pediatric Resuscitation: Implications for Pediatric Resuscitation Practice by CT Scans

Abstract 306: Similar Hemodynamic Efficacy Between 30 Mm and 50 Mm Compression Depth During Mechanical Chest Compression with Weil Mini Chest Compressor

Impact of anthropometric factors on chest compression depth during CPR provided by children aged 11-14 in a community-wide study

Two-thumb-encircling Hands Technique is More Advisable Than 2-Finger Technique when Lone Rescuer Performs Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation on Infant Manikin.

Chest compressions superimposed with sustained inflation during neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: are we ready for a clinical trial?

Effects Of Variable Depth Of Chest Compression On Outcomes Of Cpr

Developing a kinematic understanding of chest compressions: the impact of depth and release time on blood flow during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Quality of Chest Compressions During Compression-Only CPR: a Comparative Analysis Following the 2005 and 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines.

Abstract 140: Hemodynamic Efficacy and Gas Exchange During Continuous Chest Compressions or 30:2 Compression-to-Ventilation Ratio During Mechanical CPR in a Porcine Model of Cardiac Arrest

Comparison of hemodynamic effects of chest compression delivered via machine or human in asphyxiated piglets

L,Varying Chest Compression Rates During Neonatal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Randomized Controlled Animal Trial

Influence of Chest Compressions on Circulation During the Peri-Cardiac Arrest Period in Porcine Models.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation with 3:1 Compression:Ventilation or continuous compression with asynchronized ventilation in infantile piglets

Chest Compression Rates of 90/min versus 180/min during Neonatal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Randomized Controlled Animal Trial

Clinical and Hemodynamic Comparison of 15:2 and 30:2 Compression-to-ventilation Ratios for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation*