L,Varying Chest Compression Rates During Neonatal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Randomized Controlled Animal Trial

Marlies Bruckner,Mattias Neset BSc,Catalina Garcia-Hidalgo,Tze-Fun Lee,Megan O'Reilly,Po-Yin Cheung,Georg M. Schmölzer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1153413/v1
2021-12-17
Abstract:Abstract Background To compare chest compression (CC) rates of 90/min with 180/min and their effect on the time to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival, hemodynamic, and respiratory parameters. We hypothesized that asphyxiated newborn piglets that received CC at 180/min vs. 90/min during cardiopulmonary resuscitation would have a shorter time to ROSC. Methods Newborn piglets (n=7/group) were anesthetized, intubated, instrumented and exposed to 45 min normocapnic hypoxia followed by asphyxia and cardiac arrest. Piglets were randomly allocated to a CC rate of 180/min or 90/min. CC was performed using an automated chest compression machine. Hemodynamic and respiratory parameters and applied compression force were continuously measured. Results The mean (SD) time to ROSC was 91 (34) and 256 (97) sec for CC rates of 180/min and 90/min, respectively (p=0.08). The number of piglets that achieved ROSC was 7 (100%) and 5 (71%) with 180/min and 90/min CC rates, respectively (p=0.46). Hemodynamic parameters (i.e., diastolic and mean blood pressure, carotid blood flow, stroke volume, end-diastolic volume, left ventricular contractile function) and respiratory parameters (i.e., minute ventilation, peak inflation and peak expiration flow) were all improved with a CC rate of 180/min. Conclusion Time to ROSC and hemodynamic and respiratory parameters were all improved, with a CC rate of 180/min vs. 90/min. Higher CC rates during neonatal resuscitation warrant further investigation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?