Abstract:Design Systematic reviewStudy population Orthodontic patients undergoing treatment with removable thermoplastic retainers compared with conventional fixed orthodontic appliances. The mean age of patients was between 15 and 33 years. Data sources Six electronic databases including: Scopus, Web-of-Science, PubMed, Cochrane, Clinical Trials and Grey Literature were searched in addition to a search of references in eligible studies with no restriction of language. Out of 559 studies, 55 were eligible. Only four articles were included; three non-randomised and one randomised controlled trial (RCT) involving 96-182 patients. The studies included were completed within 2005-2016.Study selection Clinical trials involving orthodontic patients undergoing treatment using thermoplastic removeable aligners, namely Invisalign, in comparison to conventional fixed orthodontic appliances of either self-ligating or tip-edge bracket systems were included.Data extraction and synthesis Two members of the research team independently selected articles which fulfilled the inclusion criteria and compared results prior to data collection. A third party examiner was available to resolve disagreements. The study quality was analysed for presence of bias; three non-randomised studies were evaluated and scored using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies (MINORS), one study was considered high methodological quality, two were considered moderate. The RCT was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration Common Scheme for Bias and was deemed to be low risk of bias. Results The results suggest that Invisalign can provide successful alignment, however, it poses difficulties in achieving occlusal contacts, buccolingual inclination and vertical movement of teeth. One study found that Invisalign cases are more susceptible to relapse, which can be explained through the tipping mechanism compared to bodily movement, of conventional fixed appliances. Furthermore some studies show that although using aligners can result in overall shorter treatment time the final occlusion was not favourable. The outcome of the RCT, showed that aligners can be successful in treating class I malocclusions in extraction cases.Conclusions This systematic review found that the use of clear aligners made no significant difference to treatment time compared with conventional appliances. Additionally, removable aligners were effective in crowding cases but had limitations in achieving favourable outcomes in the anterior-posterior position and final occlusion, as well as being more likely to relapse post treatment.

Comparing Outcomes in Orthognathic Surgery Using Clear Aligners Versus Conventional Fixed Appliances.

A Case–Control Study in Cleft Lip and Palate and Skeletal Class III Patients

Are clear aligners as effective as conventional fixed appliances?

Cephalometric evaluation of changes in vertical dimension and molar position in adult non-extraction treatment with clear aligners and traditional fixed appliances

Comparison of 3-dimensional postoperative dental movement in Class III surgical correction with and without presurgical orthodontic treatment

Comparative evaluation of alveolar bone remodeling and root length changes in fixed appliances versus clear aligners: A retrospective cohort study on skeletal Class III malocclusion treatment

Comparison of treatment effects between clear aligners and fixed appliances in patients treated with miniscrew-assisted molar distalization.

Surgical Precision Analysis of Orthognathic Surgery Combined With Invisible Orthodontic

Does Invisalign Outperform Fixed Appliance in Treating Vertical Discrepancies?

Risk of root resorption between Invisalign and fixed orthodontic treatment: A retrospective study

Comparison of Short-Term Oral Impacts Experienced by Patients Treated with Invisalign or Conventional Fixed Orthodontic Appliances

Dentoskeletal effects of functional appliances vs bimaxillary surgery in hyperdivergent Class II patients

Comparative Evaluation of Postoperative Facial Swelling and Occlusion in Orthognathic Treatment with Clear Aligners versus Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A Systematic Review

The Skeletal Stability of Combined Surgery First Approach and Clear Aligners in Skeletal Class III Malocclusion Correction: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Segmental maxillary osteotomy in cleft lip and palate patients: a stepwise planning in the orthodontic pre-surgical preparation with Invisalign

Treatment effectiveness of young adults using clear aligners versus buccal fixed appliances in class I malocclusion with first premolar extraction using the ABO-Objective Grading System: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Comparisons of maxillary incisor retraction effects for patients with first premolar extractions between Damon Q and Invisalign? A retrospective study

Deep overbite reduction in adolescent patients treated with Invisalign: A retrospective analysis

Three‐Dimensional Comparative Analysis of Root Parallelism in First Premolar Extraction Cases: Clear Aligner Versus Fixed Orthodontic Appliance

The Efficiency of Segmental Le Fort I Surgery in Clear Aligner Therapy of Skeletal Class III Deformity: A Pilot Study

Occlusal contact changes in patients treated with clear aligners: A retrospective evaluation using digital dental models