Abstract:Background: Maxillary hypoplasia and mandibular asymmetry may be corrected with orthognathic surgery after growth completion. For most stable results, some cases may require segmental Le Fort I osteotomies. Unfortunately, Invisalign's software (6.0 version) still has some inherent limitations in predicting outcomes for complex surgeries. This study explores the potential of aligners, particularly in multiple-piece maxillary osteotomies in both cleft and non-cleft patients. Method: Thirteen patients who underwent pre-surgical treatment with Invisalign were retrospectively matched in terms of diagnosis, surgical procedure, and orthodontic complexity with thirteen patients treated using fixed appliances. Virtual curves following the lower arch were employed to guide the correct pre-surgical positions of the upper teeth with a simple superimposition technique. The amount of impressions required in both groups to achieve satisfactory pre-surgical alignment of the segmented arches was compared. Results: one or no refinement phases were needed in the Invisalign group to reach an acceptable pre-surgical occlusion, while the amount of pre-surgical impressions needed to reach adequate coordination with fixed appliance treatment was slightly higher (p > 0.05). Conclusions: it appears that clear aligner could serve as an effective treatment for individuals necessitating segmental Le Fort I osteotomies when aided by the suggested simple superimposition approach.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the effectiveness of using clear aligners (such as Invisalign) for preoperative orthodontic treatment in multi - segment maxillary surgery, especially in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) and skeletal Class III malocclusion. Specifically, the study aims to evaluate whether Invisalign can effectively achieve preoperative tooth alignment in these complex cases to achieve a good occlusal relationship and compare it with traditional fixed appliances. ### Research Background 1. **Maxillary Hypoplasia**: Maxillary hypoplasia is a common problem in patients with cleft lip and palate, affecting facial aesthetics and function. 2. **Orthognathic Surgery**: For patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion, orthognathic surgery is the main method to improve facial balance. Multi - segment Le Fort I osteotomy is a commonly used surgical method, but it requires complex orthodontic preparation before surgery. 3. **Limitations of Clear Aligners**: Current clear aligner software (such as ClinCheck version 6.0) has limitations in predicting complex surgical results. ### Research Objectives - **Evaluate the effectiveness of Invisalign in preoperative orthodontic treatment for multi - segment Le Fort I osteotomy**. - **Develop a simple superimposition technique** to guide the use of clear aligners to achieve correct preoperative tooth alignment. - **Compare with traditional fixed appliances** to evaluate the effect and time required for Invisalign in preoperative orthodontic treatment. ### Methods - **Study Sample**: 13 patients who underwent preoperative orthodontic treatment using Invisalign. - **Control Sample**: 13 patients who underwent preoperative orthodontic treatment using fixed appliances. - **Preoperative Orthodontic Treatment**: - **Fixed Appliances**: By regularly replacing and adjusting the archwire until the orthodontist believes that the occlusal relationship is ready for surgery. - **Clear Aligners**: Use ClinCheck software for virtual scanning and tooth position adjustment, and use a three - step method (aligning the lower teeth, drawing the guiding curve, superimposing the curve) to guide the correct alignment of the maxillary segment. ### Results - **Invisalign Group**: Most patients can meet the preoperative occlusal requirements after the first - stage treatment, with an average of 1.4 impressions and 0.4 corrections required. - **Fixed Appliance Group**: An average of 1.8 impressions (range: 1 - 3 times) are required, but the difference is not statistically significant (p > 0.05). - **Treatment Time**: The preoperative orthodontic treatment time in both groups is similar, with an average of 18.4 months in the Invisalign group and 16.3 months in the fixed appliance group. ### Discussion - **Effectiveness of Clear Aligners**: Although Invisalign software has limitations in simulating complex surgeries, preoperative tooth alignment can be effectively achieved through the three - step method. - **Treatment Time**: The treatment time of Invisalign and fixed appliances is similar, but the Invisalign group has fewer visits, which may be more suitable for patients who need to travel long distances. - **Limitations**: The retrospective nature of the study, the qualitative assessment of surgical preparation, and the repeatability of the superimposition method are the main limiting factors. ### Conclusion Clear aligners are effective in preoperative orthodontic treatment for multi - segment Le Fort I osteotomy, especially in patients with cleft lip and palate and skeletal Class III malocclusion. Through a simple superimposition technique, a satisfactory preoperative occlusal relationship can be achieved, and the treatment time is comparable to that of fixed appliances.

A Case–Control Study in Cleft Lip and Palate and Skeletal Class III Patients

Segmental maxillary osteotomy in cleft lip and palate patients: a stepwise planning in the orthodontic pre-surgical preparation with Invisalign

Comparing Outcomes in Orthognathic Surgery Using Clear Aligners Versus Conventional Fixed Appliances.

The Efficiency of Segmental Le Fort I Surgery in Clear Aligner Therapy of Skeletal Class III Deformity: A Pilot Study

Innovations in Orthodontics: Skeletal Versus Dentoalveolar Expansion Utilizing Clear Aligners and TAD-Assisted Expanders

Assessing Aligner-Directed Tooth Movements and Exploring Inherent Intramaxillary Side Effects

Reverse Engineering Orthognathic Surgery and Orthodontics in Individuals with Cleft Lip and/or Palate: A Case Report

A Full Computerized Workflow for Planning Surgically Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion and Orthognathic Surgery in a Skeletal Class III Patient

Predictability of Maxillary Molar Distalization and Derotation with Clear Aligners: A Prospective Study

Three-dimensional Analysis of Skeletal Stability in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients Undergoing Bimaxillary Surgery With Le Fort I Osteotomy and Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy

The Skeletal Stability of Combined Surgery First Approach and Clear Aligners in Skeletal Class III Malocclusion Correction: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Treatment Efficiency of Maxillary and Mandibular Orovestibular Tooth Expansion and Compression Movements with the Invisalign® System in Adolescents and Adults

Early class III treatment with hybrid rapid palatal expander combined with facemask

Nonsurgical treatment of an adult patient with severe transversal skeletal discrepancy: Tooth bone-borne tandem expander and hybrid aligner approach

Efficiency and Predictability of Coronal Maxillary Expansion Repercussion with the Aligners System: A Retrospective Study

Evaluation of the success of predicted dental changes with clear-aligner treatment: A pilot study

Simplifying the approach of open bite treatment with aligners and selective micro-osteoperforations: An adult case report

Combined orthodontic and surgical treatment supported by virtual planning in a severe mandibular asymmetry: A case report

Measuring Maxillary Posterior Tooth Movement: A Model Assessment using Palatal and Dental Superimposition

Nonsurgical orthodontic treatment using bone-anchored maxillary protraction in a patient with unilateral cleft lip and palate

Dentoskeletal effects of functional appliances vs bimaxillary surgery in hyperdivergent Class II patients