Abstract:PurposeEconomic theories on structural change focus on factors such as fluctuations in relative prices and income growth. In addition, China’s reform and opening up has also been accompanied by increasing openness, significant fluctuations in investment rates, and frictions in the labor market. Existing literature lacks a unified theoretical framework to assess the relative importance of all these determinants. The paper aims to discuss these issues.Design/methodology/approachTo incorporate all of the potential determinants of China’s structural change, the authors build a two-country four-sector neoclassical growth model that embeds the multi-sector Eaton and Kortum (2002) model of international trade, complete input-output structure, non-homothetic preference and labor market frictions. The authors decompose the sectoral employment shares into six effects: the Baumol, Engel, investment, international trade, factor intensity and labor market friction effects. Using the data of Chinese economy from 1978 to 2011, the authors perform a quantitative investigation of the six determinants’ effects through the decomposition approach and counterfactual exercises.FindingsLow-income elasticity of demand, high labor intensity, and the existence of the switching costs are the reasons for the high employment share in the agricultural sector. Technological progress, investment and international trade have comparatively less influence on the proportion difference of employment in the three sectors.Originality/valueTherefore, to examine the impact on China’s structural change, in addition to Baumol effect and the Engel effect, it is also necessary to consider the impact of three more factors: international trade, investment and switching costs. Therefore, the authors decompose the factors that may influence China’s structural change into the Baumol, Engel, investment, international trade, factor intensity effect and switching cost effects. The authors evaluate these six effects using the decomposition approach and counterfactual exercises.

New structural economic growth model and labor income share

China's Unbalanced Economic Growth and National Income Distribution

Changes In The Labor Share Of Gdp: A U-Shaped Curve

Sectoral heterogeneity, industrial structure transformation, and changes in total labor income share

The U Curve of Labor Share in GDP during Economic Development

Financial Constraints, Corporate Savings and Labor Income Share-Based on China's Economic Transition

The Structure of Income Distribution and Its Restrictions on the Growth of Chinese Economy

Financial Constraints, Corporate Savings and Labor Income Share—Based on China’s Economic Transition

From "Grabbing Hand" to "the Hand of Benevolence":Theoretical Explanation of the "U" Shaped Curve of Labor Income Share Based on the Kaldor Model

The Distortion of the Labor Market,the Difference in its Efficiency,and the Income Disparity between Peasants and Town People

Structural Change and Economic Growth in China

Change of Population Age Structure and Labor Income Share in China:Theory and Empirical Analysis

International Trade,Wage Rigidities and Labor Income Share in China

Trade Liberalisation and Labour Income Share Variation: an Interpretation of China’s Deviation from the Stolper–Samuelson Theorem

Declining Labor Share: is China's Case Different?

Determinants of China’s Structural Change During the Reform Era

A New Explanation for Changes in China's Labor Income Share: Capital Heterogeneity

Financial Repression,Distortion of Economic Structure and the Declining Labor Share Based on New Structural Economics

The Factor Income Distribution in China: 1978-2007

Reasons for the Decline of Labor Share——From the Angle of Labor-saving Technical Progress

Functional distribution of income, aggregate demand, and economic growth in the Chinese economy, 1978–2007