Abstract:Purpose This paper aims to investigate the motivations behind the publication of corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports, and particularly the effect of information asymmetry between firms and their owners. Design/methodology/approach A natural experiment contrasting the CSR reporting of private vs public firms is used to test whether the degree of information asymmetry is a significant factor in the decision to publish CSR reports. Using a hand-collected sample of the 239 largest US private companies matched with publicly-traded firms, the effect of these inherently different information environments on CSR reporting is tested through logistic regression. Factors suggested by stakeholder and legitimacy theories are tested for their differential impact on private vs public firms’ decisions to publish a CSR report. Findings Results indicate that private firms are less likely to publish a CSR report than similar public firms. Public firms also follow Global Reporting Initiative guidelines more frequently, consistent with signaling report quality to dispersed investors. A subsample of private companies facing greater information asymmetry is found to be similar to public firms in their reporting behavior, reinforcing the link between information asymmetry and CSR disclosure. Further analysis suggests that non-owner stakeholders play an important role in private companies’ CSR reporting decisions. Practical implications In addition to accounting and governance scholars, the findings should interest private firm managers preparing for an initial public offering (IPO), as the evidence suggests that CSR reporting is used to communicate information to dispersed investors. The insight into reporting motivations should be useful to accountants engaged in CSR consultation and assurance. Social implications With the growing attention paid to the CSR performance of firms, demonstrated by the growth in socially responsible investing, the study provides evidence that effective communication of CSR information to investors may play a key role in CSR-engaged firms’ disclosure strategies. Originality/value To the best of the author’s knowledge, this study is the first to analyze the CSR reporting decisions of a large sample of publicly-traded and privately-held firms. The results add to our understanding of what motivates firms to publish CSR reports, highlighting the importance of information asymmetry between the firm and its owners.

Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting and Organizational Stigma: The Case of “Sin” Industries

Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in Controversial Industries

Preventive and Remedial Actions in Corporate Reporting Among "Addiction Industries": Legitimacy, Effectiveness and Hypocrisy Perception

Doing Well While Doing Bad? CSR in Controversial Industry Sectors

Washing Away Their Stigma? the ESG of “sin” Firms

Controversial Industries , Regional Differences , and Risk : Role of CSR

The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets

The Impact of Sin Culture: Evidence from Earnings Management and Alcohol Consumption in China

Corporate social responsibility and environmental reporting in controversial industries

CSR signals: exploring their use in controversial industries

Stigma as moral insurance: How stigma buffers firms from the market consequences of greenwashing

Signaling Consumer Impressions with CSR Support on Social Media: The Roles of Industry Stigma and Consumer Self-Disclosure

The cost of sin: The effect of social norms on audit pricing

Information asymmetry in CSR reporting: publicly-traded versus privately-held firms

The impact of corporate social responsibility on investment recommendations: Analysts' perceptions and shifting institutional logics

Corporate social responsibility information and involvement strategies in controversial industries

Does CSR Reduce Firm Risk? Evidence from Controversial Industry Sectors

Transparency and Industry Stigmatization in Strategic CSR Communication

Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of equity in controversial industry sectors?