Abstract:Purpose This paper aims to investigate the motivations behind the publication of corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports, and particularly the effect of information asymmetry between firms and their owners. Design/methodology/approach A natural experiment contrasting the CSR reporting of private vs public firms is used to test whether the degree of information asymmetry is a significant factor in the decision to publish CSR reports. Using a hand-collected sample of the 239 largest US private companies matched with publicly-traded firms, the effect of these inherently different information environments on CSR reporting is tested through logistic regression. Factors suggested by stakeholder and legitimacy theories are tested for their differential impact on private vs public firms’ decisions to publish a CSR report. Findings Results indicate that private firms are less likely to publish a CSR report than similar public firms. Public firms also follow Global Reporting Initiative guidelines more frequently, consistent with signaling report quality to dispersed investors. A subsample of private companies facing greater information asymmetry is found to be similar to public firms in their reporting behavior, reinforcing the link between information asymmetry and CSR disclosure. Further analysis suggests that non-owner stakeholders play an important role in private companies’ CSR reporting decisions. Practical implications In addition to accounting and governance scholars, the findings should interest private firm managers preparing for an initial public offering (IPO), as the evidence suggests that CSR reporting is used to communicate information to dispersed investors. The insight into reporting motivations should be useful to accountants engaged in CSR consultation and assurance. Social implications With the growing attention paid to the CSR performance of firms, demonstrated by the growth in socially responsible investing, the study provides evidence that effective communication of CSR information to investors may play a key role in CSR-engaged firms’ disclosure strategies. Originality/value To the best of the author’s knowledge, this study is the first to analyze the CSR reporting decisions of a large sample of publicly-traded and privately-held firms. The results add to our understanding of what motivates firms to publish CSR reports, highlighting the importance of information asymmetry between the firm and its owners.

Reputation and Corporate Social Responsibility Aberrations, Trends, and Hypocrisy: Reactions to Firm Choices in the Stock Option Backdating Scandal

Stock Market Reaction To Data Breaches: The Moderating Role Of Corporate Social Responsibility

The Role of Corporate Reputation and Crisis Response Strategies in Data Breach Management.

Backdating of CEO Stock Option Grants and Timing of Earnings Disclosures

CEO Stock Option Grants: the Economic Consequences of Revelation of Backdating and the Confounding Effect of Good-Timing of Earnings Disclosure

Timing of CEO Stock Option Grants and Corporate Disclosures: New Evidence from the Post-SOX and Post-Backdating-Scandal Era

Reputation as insurance: how reputation moderates public backlash following a company's decision to profiteer

Corporate social responsibility: opportunistic behavior under earnings management?

Transparency versus Performance in Financial Markets: The Role of CSR Communications

Does CSR reputation mitigate the impact of corporate social irresponsibility?

Restoring an eroded legitimacy: the adaptation of nonfinancial disclosure after a scandal and the risk of hypocrisy

Can corporate social responsibility deter consumer dysfunctional behavior?

Doing Well While Doing Bad? CSR in Controversial Industry Sectors

Do Firms Manage Their CSR Reputation? Evidence from Twitter

Corporate Hypocrisy: Overcoming the Threat of Inconsistent Corporate Social Responsibility Perceptions

Higher Highs and Lower Lows: The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in CEO Dismissal

Too Much of a Good Thing? the Boomerang Effect of Firms’ Investments on Corporate Social Responsibility During Product Recalls

The Credibility of Stock Repurchase Signals

Information asymmetry in CSR reporting: publicly-traded versus privately-held firms

The impact of corporate social responsibility on investment recommendations: Analysts' perceptions and shifting institutional logics

Corporate Social Responsibility and Investor Relations Management: Evidence from China