Abstract:Corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives are signals used by organizations to reduce information asymmetries within the market and to make their commitment to sustainability observable. The present study aims at investigating the hypothesis that responsible companies operating in controversial industries (i.e., companies whose core business or production processes are perceived as questionable by society given current environmental, social, or/and ethical issues) are likely to be more active in using different types of CSR signals. Through ANCOVA, we assess how firms belonging to both controversial and non-controversial industries differ in the way they manage CSR signals. The empirical results show that companies in controversial sectors are significantly more focused on developing CSR policies and transparency tools since they expect these signals to be really visible and distinctive to stakeholders. However, companies in controversial industries seem to be similar to non-controversial companies in signaling CSR governance, suggesting that organizations expect receivers to attribute little relevance to the least visible signals. Therefore, these signals do not grant a sufficiently large reputational payoff, discouraging firms from taking advantage of the implementation of CSR governance structures. The study supports the idea that firms, in designing different types of CSR signals, take into account the peculiarities of different receivers. At the same time though, this could make firms underestimate the receivers’ ability to decode the signals and to generate countersignals, thus failing in assessing properly the expected return from their CSR signaling.

Transparency and Industry Stigmatization in Strategic CSR Communication

Signaling Consumer Impressions with CSR Support on Social Media: The Roles of Industry Stigma and Consumer Self-Disclosure

Toward effective CSR communication in controversial industry sectors

Transparency versus Performance in Financial Markets: The Role of CSR Communications

Perceived motivations for corporate social responsibility initiatives in socially stigmatized industries

When Bad Becomes Good: The Role of Congruence and Product Type in the CSR Initiatives of Stigmatized Industries

The Role of Public Skepticism and Distrust in the Process of CSR Communication

Cross-National Study of Transparency in CSR Communication and Corporate Trust: Mediating Roles of Perceived Altruism and Perceived Skepticism

Pride or empathy? Exploring effective CSR communication strategies on social media

The Uneven Returns of Transparency in Voluntary Nonfinancial Disclosures

Corporate social responsibility information and involvement strategies in controversial industries

CSR signaling in controversial and noncontroversial industries: CSR policies, governance structures, and transparency tools

The effects of consideration of future consequences and CSR fit in stigmatized industries: Perceived CSR motives as mediators

The Formation of Reputation in CSR Disclosure: the Role of Signal Transmission and Sensemaking Processes of Stakeholders

Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting and Organizational Stigma: The Case of “Sin” Industries

Controversial Industries , Regional Differences , and Risk : Role of CSR

CSR signals: exploring their use in controversial industries

Linking Authenticity in CSR Communication to Organization-Public Relationship Outcomes: Integrating Theories of Impression Management and Relationship Management

Online corporate social responsibility communication strategies and stakeholder engagements: A comparison of controversial versus noncontroversial industries