Abstract:Existing guidance from ASTM standards on extracting mechanical properties from uniaxial tension test data is not suitable for high-volume applications because it lacks automation. The Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) has performed over 450 uniaxial tension tests on samples extracted from dozens of distinct natural gas pipeline features in support of materials verification efforts; 144 of these tests recorded the entire deformation response up to fracture and were subsequently analyzed herein. Algorithms were developed to enable automatic, batch post-processing of the tensile data. Among the mechanical properties that this software extracts from the tensile data are the power-law hardening exponent and strength coefficient. A novel algorithm was developed to calculate these power-law parameters while accommodating the range of yielding and hardening behaviors present among the low carbon pipeline steels tested in this effort. The algorithm, presented in this brief technical note, first identifies the lower limit of the hardening region by calculating the tangent modulus of the stress–strain curve, which reaches its maximum value at the onset of strain hardening. The end of uniaxial hardening coincides with the ultimate tensile stress and the end of uniform deformation. From there the algorithm computes the power-law hardening parameters using conventional linear regression. Analysis of the data shows that this approach is more accurate than two other approaches: (1) regressing from 0.2% plastic strain to the limit load, and (2) iteratively regressing to identify the region that minimizes the regression error. The advantage of this approach, over existing methods, is observed for materials that exhibit a yield plateau. To further demonstrate the utility of the strain hardening information collected during this effort, the relationship between strain hardening exponent and ratio of yield strength to ultimate tensile strength from this data was compared to those reported in previous literature pertaining to remaining life assessments of steel line pipe. Overall, the strain hardening data obtained in this algorithm indicates greater hardening in pipeline steels than some previously published results. This algorithm has been made available as part of this paper's supplementary materials.

Automated Calculation of Strain Hardening Parameters from Tensile Stress vs. Strain Data for Low Carbon Steel Exhibiting Yield Point Elongation

Accurate Estimation of Yield Strength and Ultimate Tensile Strength through Instrumented Indentation Testing and Chemical Composition Testing

Strain Based Design Of High Strength Pipelines

A Quantitative Approach to Tensile Strain Capacity of Pipelines

Strain-Hardening Properties of High Grade Line Pipes

Tensile Strain Models for Strain-Based Design of Pipelines

Experimental Methodology for Obtaining the Flow Curve of Sheet Materials in a Wide Range of Strains

Considerations Of Linepipe And Girth Weld Tensile Properties For Strain-Based Design Of Pipelines

Data-driven estimation of plastic properties in work-hardening model combining power-law and linear hardening using instrumented indentation test

Strain Rate-Dependent Hyperbolic Constitutive Model for Tensile Behavior of PE100 Pipe Material

Full-Scale Pipe Strain Test Quality and Safety Factor Determination for Strain-Based Engineering Critical Assessment

Apparent Fracture Toughness from Constraint Considerations and Direct Testing

The Toughness-Induced Crack Deceleration Mechanism on Ultra-High Pressure Steel Gas Pipelines

On the flat punch hole expansion test of sheet metals: Mechanics of deformation and evaluation of anisotropic plasticity models

Application Of Compressive Strain Capacity Models To Multiple Grades Of Pipelines

Study of Strain Capacity for High-Strain Marine Pipe

Critical Buckling Strain Equations for Energy Pipelines—A Parametric Study

Deformation Behavior Prediction Of X80 Steel Line Pipe And Implication On High Strain Pipe Specification

An Experimental Methodology to Characterize the Plasticity of Sheet Metals from Uniaxial to Plane Strain Tension

Improvements to the ASME B31.8 Dent Strain Equations

Test evaluation of high strain line pipe material