Abstract:The urgency of climate change calls for rapid mitigation and bioenergy is projected to play a major role in temperate regions. To comprehensively examine the environmental sustainability implications of expanding agricultural bioenergy production, we synthesized the existing scientific literature on biodiversity and ecosystem service impacts from land‐use changes to feedstock production in temperate agricultural landscapes. Synergistic benefits for biodiversity and ecosystem services mainly occur when perennial feedstock is integrated into intensive arable landscapes. The use of marginal and abandoned land could alleviate trade‐offs with food production, but our review shows that ecological impacts are largely unknown and needs further research. The Paris agreement on climate change requires rapid reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. One important mitigation strategy, at least in the intermediate future, is the substitution of fossil fuels with bioenergy. However, using agriculture‐ and forest‐derived biomass for energy has sparked controversy regarding both the climate mitigation potential and conflicts with biodiversity conservation. The urgency of the climate crisis calls for using forests for carbon sequestration and storage rather than for bioenergy, making agricultural biomass an attractive alternative for fossil energy substitution. However, this calls for comprehensive assessments of its sustainability in terms of consequences for biodiversity and ecosystem services. In this review, we provide a first holistic overview of the impacts on ecosystems of land‐use changes from bioenergy crop production in temperate climates, by synthesizing results on both biodiversity and ecosystem service impacts. We found that bioenergy‐related land‐use changes can have both positive and negative effects on ecosystems, with original land use, bioenergy crop type and scale of bioenergy production being important moderators of impacts. Despite the risk of opportunity cost for food production, perennial crop cultivation on arable land had the lowest occurrence of negative impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Growing biomass for bioenergy on surplus land has been suggested as a way to alleviate competition with food production and biodiversity conservation, but our results demonstrate that utilizing marginal or abandoned land for bioenergy crop production cannot fully resolve these trade‐offs. Furthermore, there is a lack of empirical studies of the biodiversity value of marginal and abandoned land, limiting our understanding of the sustainability implications of biomass cultivation on surplus land. We argue that future research and policies for bioenergy production must explicitly consider biodiversity and ecosystem services in combination to avoid potential trade‐offs between the two and to ensure sustainable bioenergy production.

Bioenergy revisited: key factors in global potentials of bioenergy

Biomass Assessment. Assessment of global biomass potentials and their links to food, water, biodiversity, energy demand and economy. Inventory and analysis of existing studies …

Future bio-energy potential under various natural constraints

Global bioenergy potentials projections for 2050

Bio-energy use and low stabilization scenarios

Bioenergy and climate change mitigation: an assessment

EU bioenergy development to 2050

Renewable energy sources: Their global potential for the first-half of the 21st century at a global level: An integrated approach

Bioenergy in energy transformation and climate management

Bioenergy crops, biodiversity and ecosystem services in temperate agricultural landscapes—A review of synergies and trade‐offs

Exploratory study on the land area required for global food supply and the potential global production of bioenergy

Quo Vadis, Biomass? Long‐Term Scenarios of an Optimal Energetic Use of Biomass for the German Energy Transition

Introduction and context: global biomass resources - types of biomass, quantities and accessibility. Biomass from agriculture, forestry, energy crops and organic wastes

The impact of biomass crop cultivation on temperate biodiversity

Global Advanced Bioenergy Potential under Environmental Protection Policies and Societal Transformation Measures

Biomass residues as twenty-first century bioenergy feedstock—a comparison of eight integrated assessment models

Integrated assessment of biomass supply and demand in climate change mitigation scenarios

Biomass Energy and Biofuels: Perspective, Potentials, and Challenges in the Energy Transition

Bioenergy in Europe is unlikely to make a timely contribution to climate change targets

Energy Utilization and Conversion in Modern Biomass Conversion Technologies

Biofuels: Efficiency, Ethics, and Limits to Human Appropriation of Ecosystem Services