Abstract:The urgency of climate change calls for rapid mitigation and bioenergy is projected to play a major role in temperate regions. To comprehensively examine the environmental sustainability implications of expanding agricultural bioenergy production, we synthesized the existing scientific literature on biodiversity and ecosystem service impacts from land‐use changes to feedstock production in temperate agricultural landscapes. Synergistic benefits for biodiversity and ecosystem services mainly occur when perennial feedstock is integrated into intensive arable landscapes. The use of marginal and abandoned land could alleviate trade‐offs with food production, but our review shows that ecological impacts are largely unknown and needs further research. The Paris agreement on climate change requires rapid reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. One important mitigation strategy, at least in the intermediate future, is the substitution of fossil fuels with bioenergy. However, using agriculture‐ and forest‐derived biomass for energy has sparked controversy regarding both the climate mitigation potential and conflicts with biodiversity conservation. The urgency of the climate crisis calls for using forests for carbon sequestration and storage rather than for bioenergy, making agricultural biomass an attractive alternative for fossil energy substitution. However, this calls for comprehensive assessments of its sustainability in terms of consequences for biodiversity and ecosystem services. In this review, we provide a first holistic overview of the impacts on ecosystems of land‐use changes from bioenergy crop production in temperate climates, by synthesizing results on both biodiversity and ecosystem service impacts. We found that bioenergy‐related land‐use changes can have both positive and negative effects on ecosystems, with original land use, bioenergy crop type and scale of bioenergy production being important moderators of impacts. Despite the risk of opportunity cost for food production, perennial crop cultivation on arable land had the lowest occurrence of negative impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Growing biomass for bioenergy on surplus land has been suggested as a way to alleviate competition with food production and biodiversity conservation, but our results demonstrate that utilizing marginal or abandoned land for bioenergy crop production cannot fully resolve these trade‐offs. Furthermore, there is a lack of empirical studies of the biodiversity value of marginal and abandoned land, limiting our understanding of the sustainability implications of biomass cultivation on surplus land. We argue that future research and policies for bioenergy production must explicitly consider biodiversity and ecosystem services in combination to avoid potential trade‐offs between the two and to ensure sustainable bioenergy production.

Future bio-energy potential under various natural constraints

Bio-energy use and low stabilization scenarios

An evaluation of the global potential of bioenergy production on degraded lands

Bioenergy revisited: key factors in global potentials of bioenergy

Renewable energy sources: Their global potential for the first-half of the 21st century at a global level: An integrated approach

Global Advanced Bioenergy Potential under Environmental Protection Policies and Societal Transformation Measures

Global bioenergy potentials projections for 2050

Bioenergy in energy transformation and climate management

Land suitability for energy crops under scenarios of climate change and land‐use

Bioenergy and climate change mitigation: an assessment

Biomass Assessment. Assessment of global biomass potentials and their links to food, water, biodiversity, energy demand and economy. Inventory and analysis of existing studies …

Bioenergy crops, biodiversity and ecosystem services in temperate agricultural landscapes—A review of synergies and trade‐offs

Exploratory study on the land area required for global food supply and the potential global production of bioenergy

Projections of the availability and cost of residues from agriculture and forestry

Land-use transition for bioenergy and climate stabilization: model comparison of drivers, impacts and interactions with other land use based mitigation options

Temperature Changes Induced by Biogeochemical and Biophysical Effects of Bioenergy Crop Cultivation

A Fine-Resolution Estimation of the Biomass Resource Potential Across China from 2020 to 2100

Bioenergy Production Potential of 16 Energy Crops on Marginal Land in China

Bioenergy Crops for Low Warming Targets Require Half of the Present Agricultural Fertilizer Use

Evaluating the Marginal Land Resources Suitable for Developing Bioenergy in Asia

Land-use change from food to energy: meta-analysis unravels effects of bioenergy on biodiversity and cultural ecosystem services