Abstract:The urgency of climate change calls for rapid mitigation and bioenergy is projected to play a major role in temperate regions. To comprehensively examine the environmental sustainability implications of expanding agricultural bioenergy production, we synthesized the existing scientific literature on biodiversity and ecosystem service impacts from land‐use changes to feedstock production in temperate agricultural landscapes. Synergistic benefits for biodiversity and ecosystem services mainly occur when perennial feedstock is integrated into intensive arable landscapes. The use of marginal and abandoned land could alleviate trade‐offs with food production, but our review shows that ecological impacts are largely unknown and needs further research. The Paris agreement on climate change requires rapid reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. One important mitigation strategy, at least in the intermediate future, is the substitution of fossil fuels with bioenergy. However, using agriculture‐ and forest‐derived biomass for energy has sparked controversy regarding both the climate mitigation potential and conflicts with biodiversity conservation. The urgency of the climate crisis calls for using forests for carbon sequestration and storage rather than for bioenergy, making agricultural biomass an attractive alternative for fossil energy substitution. However, this calls for comprehensive assessments of its sustainability in terms of consequences for biodiversity and ecosystem services. In this review, we provide a first holistic overview of the impacts on ecosystems of land‐use changes from bioenergy crop production in temperate climates, by synthesizing results on both biodiversity and ecosystem service impacts. We found that bioenergy‐related land‐use changes can have both positive and negative effects on ecosystems, with original land use, bioenergy crop type and scale of bioenergy production being important moderators of impacts. Despite the risk of opportunity cost for food production, perennial crop cultivation on arable land had the lowest occurrence of negative impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Growing biomass for bioenergy on surplus land has been suggested as a way to alleviate competition with food production and biodiversity conservation, but our results demonstrate that utilizing marginal or abandoned land for bioenergy crop production cannot fully resolve these trade‐offs. Furthermore, there is a lack of empirical studies of the biodiversity value of marginal and abandoned land, limiting our understanding of the sustainability implications of biomass cultivation on surplus land. We argue that future research and policies for bioenergy production must explicitly consider biodiversity and ecosystem services in combination to avoid potential trade‐offs between the two and to ensure sustainable bioenergy production.

Bioenergy and climate change mitigation: an assessment

Bioenergy for climate change mitigation: Scale and sustainability

Applying a science‐based systems perspective to dispel misconceptions about climate effects of forest bioenergy

Bio-energy and CO2 emission reductions: an integrated land-use and energy sector perspective

Temperature Changes Induced by Biogeochemical and Biophysical Effects of Bioenergy Crop Cultivation

The impact of land‐use change emissions on the potential of bioenergy as climate change mitigation option for a Brazilian low‐carbon energy system

Bioenergy in energy transformation and climate management

Land-use transition for bioenergy and climate stabilization: model comparison of drivers, impacts and interactions with other land use based mitigation options

Bioenergy in Europe is unlikely to make a timely contribution to climate change targets

A Review of Influencing Factors for Policy Interventions in the Deployment of Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage

Impact of bioenergy crop expansion on climate–carbon cycle feedbacks in overshoot scenarios

Evaluating the use of biomass energy with carbon capture and storage in low emission scenarios

Bioenergy crops, biodiversity and ecosystem services in temperate agricultural landscapes—A review of synergies and trade‐offs

Land suitability for energy crops under scenarios of climate change and land‐use

The climate change mitigation potential of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage

The impact of biomass crop cultivation on temperate biodiversity

Consensus, uncertainties and challenges for perennial bioenergy crops and land use

Climate vs Energy Security: Quantifying the Trade-offs of BECCS Deployment and Overcoming Opportunity Costs on Set-Aside Land

Global energy sector emission reductions and bioenergy use: overview of the bioenergy demand phase of the EMF-33 model comparison

Delayed Use of Bioenergy Crops Might Threaten Climate and Food Security.

Bioenergy revisited: key factors in global potentials of bioenergy