The impact of land‐use change emissions on the potential of bioenergy as climate change mitigation option for a Brazilian low‐carbon energy system

Tjerk Lap,Vassilis Daioglou,René Benders,Floor Hilst,André Faaij
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12901
2021-11-30
GCB Bioenergy
Abstract:Land use change (LUC) related GHG emissions determine largely if bioenergy is a suitable option for climate change mitigation. This study assesses how LUC emissions influence demand for bioenergy to mitigate GHG emissions, and how this affects the energy mix, using Brazil as a case study. A methodological framework is applied linking bioenergy supply curves, with associated costs and spatially explicit LUC emissions, to a bottom-up energy system model. Furthermore, the influence of four key determining parameters is assessed; agricultural productivity, time horizon, natural succession, and the use of dynamic emission factors.Demand for new bioenergy plantations range from 0.5-6.7 EJ in 2050, and is avoided when its emission factor (EF) reaches above 15 kg CO2/GJbiomass. Dynamic EFs result in earlier and larger use of bioenergy. Static EFs attenuate all emissions evenly over time, resulting in relative high emissions around 2050 when the carbon budget is most stringent. This in contrast to dynamic EFs, having early high peaks because of clearance of natural vegetation, but relatively small long-term emissions when the carbon budget is most stringent. Exclusion of natural succession, in combination with spared agricultural land, results in a demand of 6.7 EJ, because of its low carbon penalty. Assuming that land is spared due to continues yield increase (which is the reason to include natural succession as and EF component), bypasses the fact that yield improvements (that make those lands available) take place because of demand for bioenergy. When low carbon biomass is limited available, increasing electrification is observed, leading to electric capacity increase of 62% (mainly wind and solar energy), and a 12% energy system costs increase. Inclusion of spatio-temporal explicit supply potential and LUC emissions, leads to improved bioenergy deployment pathways that come closer to the real situation as the dynamic nature of LUC emissions is included.
English Else
What problem does this paper attempt to address?