Abstract:BackgroundThe wide-ranging program of reforms brought about by the Health and Social Care Act (2012) in England fundamentally changed the operation of the public health system, moving responsibility for the commissioning and delivery of services from the National Health Service to locally elected councils and a new national public health agency. This paper explores the ways in which the reforms have altered public health commissioning.MethodsWe conducted multi-methods research over 33 months, incorporating national surveys of Directors of Public Health and local council elected members at two time-points, and in-depth case studies in five purposively selected geographical areas.ResultsPublic health commissioning responsibilities have changed and become more fragmented, being split amongst a range of different organisations, most of which were newly created in 2013. There is much change in the way public health commissioning is done, in who is doing it, and in what is commissioned, since the reforms. There is wider consultation on decisions in the local council setting than in the NHS, and elected members now have a strong influence on public health prioritisation. There is more (and different) scrutiny being applied to public health contracts, and most councils have embarked on wide-ranging changes to the health improvement services they commission. Public health money is being used in different ways as councils are adapting to increasing financial constraint.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that, while some of the intended opportunities to improve population health and create a more joined-up system with clearer leadership have been achieved, fragmentation, dispersed decision-making and uncertainties regarding funding remain significant challenges. There have been profound changes in commissioning processes, with consequences for what health improvement services are ultimately commissioned. Time (and further research) will tell if any of these changes lead to improved population health outcomes and reduced health inequalities, but many of the opportunities brought about by the reforms are threatened by the continued flux in the system.

Sixty seconds on . . . NHS reforms

Does NHS England Have a Slow Puncture?

Sixty seconds on . . . fixing the NHS

Any NHS reform has to avoid a repeat of 2012

Expert Questions Whether NHS Can Be Transformed Without Further Upheaval.

NHS England’s Plans to Cut Specialised Service Providers from 270 to under 30 Might Not Be “sensible,” Conference Hears

Reaffirming our commitment to the NHS is needed now more than ever

The NHS doesn't need reimagining: we ȷust need to stop burning money

Darzi's NHS review shows depth of problems for Labour

My goal for the independent investigation into the performance of the health service in England

RESTRUCTURING THE NHS AGAIN: SUPPLY SIDE REFORM IN RECENT ENGLISH HEALTH CARE POLICY

Declaring a health and care emergency

OHID: Cuts to disparities office could worsen health inequalities, doctors warn

Only 12 of 211 Commissioning Groups Are Acting on Integrated Care, Conference Hears

New Models of Healthcare Will Replace Nearly Three Quarters of NHS by 2024, Report Says.

Wes Streeting wants hard truths? General practice needs nationalising

Commissioning for health improvement following the 2012 health and social care reforms in England: what has changed?

Government Has Turned NHS into "byzantine System" Nobody Wanted, Porter Says.

The British NHS at 75: Past, Contemporary, and Future Challenges

Only radical reform will save general practice: we need to rethink GP partnerships

Devolution of Health Budget to Councils Could See NHS Spending Eroded, Expert Warns