Abstract:BackgroundThe wide-ranging program of reforms brought about by the Health and Social Care Act (2012) in England fundamentally changed the operation of the public health system, moving responsibility for the commissioning and delivery of services from the National Health Service to locally elected councils and a new national public health agency. This paper explores the ways in which the reforms have altered public health commissioning.MethodsWe conducted multi-methods research over 33 months, incorporating national surveys of Directors of Public Health and local council elected members at two time-points, and in-depth case studies in five purposively selected geographical areas.ResultsPublic health commissioning responsibilities have changed and become more fragmented, being split amongst a range of different organisations, most of which were newly created in 2013. There is much change in the way public health commissioning is done, in who is doing it, and in what is commissioned, since the reforms. There is wider consultation on decisions in the local council setting than in the NHS, and elected members now have a strong influence on public health prioritisation. There is more (and different) scrutiny being applied to public health contracts, and most councils have embarked on wide-ranging changes to the health improvement services they commission. Public health money is being used in different ways as councils are adapting to increasing financial constraint.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that, while some of the intended opportunities to improve population health and create a more joined-up system with clearer leadership have been achieved, fragmentation, dispersed decision-making and uncertainties regarding funding remain significant challenges. There have been profound changes in commissioning processes, with consequences for what health improvement services are ultimately commissioned. Time (and further research) will tell if any of these changes lead to improved population health outcomes and reduced health inequalities, but many of the opportunities brought about by the reforms are threatened by the continued flux in the system.

OHID: Cuts to disparities office could worsen health inequalities, doctors warn

Restructuring of the Office for Health Improvement and Disparities is a further step in the wrong direction for tackling health inequalities

Government action is needed to tackle the "turmoil" in the public health system highlighted by the Darzi review

Transforming health systems to reduce health inequalities

Public health is in crisis, but it can be fixed

NHS England’s Plans to Cut Specialised Service Providers from 270 to under 30 Might Not Be “sensible,” Conference Hears

Does NHS England Have a Slow Puncture?

Sixty seconds on . . . NHS reforms

Declaring a health and care emergency

Health department lacks grip on spending and clinical negligence payouts, MPs warn

Commissioning for health improvement following the 2012 health and social care reforms in England: what has changed?

Steady undermining of the UK National Health Service underlies industrial action by doctors and other staff

Public health funding settlement is "nowhere near enough" leaders warn

Half of UK workers don't have access to essential workplace healthcare, report finds

The medicalisation of health inequalities and the English NHS: the role of resource allocation

Ethnic inequalities among NHS staff in England: workplace experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic

Any NHS reform has to avoid a repeat of 2012

Hospital Trusts Will Have to Cut Activity when Integration Fund Comes into Effect, Meeting is Told

Nhs Chief Tells Politicians to Embrace Hospital Closures to Improve Services for Patients

Decline in child health in the UK is a national scandal

Austerity policies: levelling down?