Abstract:Purpose: This qualitative study aims to examine key stakeholders' perspectives of primary care group/trust prescribing strategies. Within the context of general practice prescribing, the paper also debates the wider issue of whether GPs' prescribing autonomy is under threat from managerial expansion following recent organisational changes in primary care. Design/methodology/approach: Data were obtained from focus groups and a series of individual semi-structured interviews with GPs and key primary care organisation stakeholders. Findings: The data underlie a tension between the managerial objective of cost-restraint and GPs' commitment to quality improvement and individual clinical patient management. In presenting both managerial and medical narratives, two divergent and often conflicting discourses emerge, which leads to speculation that managerial attempts to constrain prescribing autonomy will achieve only limited success. The contention is that GPs' discourse features as a challenge to a managerial discourse that reflects attempts to regulate, standardise and curtail clinical discretion. This is due not only to GPs' expressed hegemonic ideals that clinical practice centres on the interests of the individual patient, but also to the fact that the managerial discourse of evidence-based medicine encapsulates only a limited share of the knowledge that GPs draw on in decision making. However, while managers' discourse presented them as unwilling to impose change or directly challenge clinical practice, evidence also emerged to suggest that is not yet possible to be sufficiently convinced of the future retention of prescribing autonomy. On the other hand, the use of peer scrutiny posed an indirect managerial influence on prescribing, whilst the emergence of prescribing advisors as analysts of cost-effectiveness may threaten doctors' dominance of medical knowledge. Research limitations/implications: There is a continuing need to analyse the impact of the new managerial reforms on primary care prescribing. Originality/value: This study provides a snapshot of managerial and GP relations at a time of primary care transition.

Only radical reform will save general practice: we need to rethink GP partnerships

Wes Streeting wants hard truths? General practice needs nationalising

In conversation with a new GP

Regarding general practice: an appeal to the new UK Government

The performance of general practice in the English National Health Service (NHS): an analysis using Starfield's framework for primary care

Continuity of care in general practice: avoid the blunt sledgehammers of national policy

When is a GP not a GP? The 'othering' of new GP roles

Give GPs their old jobs back

Any NHS reform has to avoid a repeat of 2012

Amidst a GP workforce crisis, where did all the jobs go?

GP contract: Practices at risk of closure unless 1.9% offer is improved, warns BMA

Streeting vows to slash red tape in general practice

The real work of general practice: understanding our hidden workload

The NHS Long Term Workforce Plan: what does this mean for general practices?

GP workforce sustainability to maximise effective and equitable patient care: a realist review of what works, for whom and in what circumstances?

Repairing general practice will be a priority for Labour, says Streeting

Perceptions of the impact of primary care organizations on GP prescribing: the iron fist in the velvet glove?

The expansion of physician associates in primary care risks alienating an already ailing GP workforce

Embracing general practice's inner platypus

GPs in Wales need "urgent rescue package" after 100 practices close, says BMA

Optimising individual and community involvement in health decision-making in general practice consultations and primary care settings: A way forward