Continuity of care in general practice: avoid the blunt sledgehammers of national policy

Stephen Black
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q112
2024-01-19
BMJ
Abstract:Reviews of the importance of general practitioner continuity are useful.1 But it is unhelpful that two major problems were missed or misrepresented.The first mistake is the focus on continuity for all. Some patients need continuity far more than others, and focusing on those who need it most would be useful in a resource constrained environment like the UK. Many studies simply ignore this by analysing the results across all patients. Demanding universal continuity based on these studies leads to a policy sledgehammer when a nutcracker would be better.The second problem is the casual unreferenced claim that "targets for speed of access and encouragement of on-the-day teams and remote triage have reduced continuity and undervalued GPs." But there is no solid evidence that either speed of access or remote triage hurt continuity if implemented well.The typical traditional model of making a GP request (phoning reception and hoping they find any slot...
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?