Sex Differences in Thermal Behavior During Exercise Recovery
Nicole T. Vargas,Christopher L. Chapman,James R. Sackett,Jabril Abdul-Rashad,Blair D. Johnson,Rob Gathercole,Zachary J. Schlader
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.2018.32.1_supplement.590.20
2018-01-01
Abstract:Purpose Females (F) more rapidly withdraw heat loss thermoeffectors post‐exercise compared to males (M), prolonging elevations in core temperature (T core ). Thermal behavior may compensate for this response, but it is not known if thermal behavior differs between M and F. We tested the hypothesis that thermal behavior remains engaged post‐exercise for a longer time in F than M. Methods In a 24°C (43% RH) environment, 17 adults (9 F, 22 ± 2 y) cycled for 60 min, followed by 60 min seated recovery. Mean skin temperature (T skin , 10 site), T core (intestinal) and mean skin wetness (w skin , 4 site) were measured continually. Subjects controlled the temperature of their dorsal neck to perceived thermal comfort using a custom made fluid filled device. Neck device temperature (T device ) provided an index of thermal behavior. A linear regression was performed with T skin , T core , and w skin as independent variables and T device as the dependent variable. Standardized beta coefficients were used to determine the relative contribution of each variable to T device . Results Metabolic heat production did not differ between sexes during exercise (M: 133 ± 5, F: 123 ± 8 W/m 2 , P=0.40). T skin (P=0.80), T core (P=0.97), w skin (P=0.76), and T device (P=0.13) did not differ between sexes during exercise or recovery. During exercise, T skin increased in F (Pre‐Exercise (PreEx): 29.6 ± 0.7°C; End‐Exercise (EndEx): 30.4 ± 0.6°C, P≤0.02), and decreased in recovery (End‐Recovery (EndRec): 29.7 ± 0.6°C, P≤0.01). T skin did not change throughout in M (PreEx: 29.5 ± 0.6; EndEx: 30.0 ± 0.8, EndRec: 29.5 ± 0.7°C, P≥0.42). T core increased in F (PreEx: 37.3 ± 0.3, EndEx: 38.1 ± 0.2°C, P<0.01) and M (PreEx: 37.0 ± 0.3; EndEx: 37.5 ± 0.3°C, P<0.01) during exercise, remaining elevated until 40 min recovery (F: 37.5 ± 0.2, P=0.20; M: 37.3 ± 0.4°C, P=0.08). w skin increased in F (PreEx: 0.21 ± 0.06; EndEx: 0.25 ± 0.03 a.u., P=0.01) and M (PreEx: 0.17 ± 0.06; EndEx: 0.22 ± 0.05 a.u., P=0.03) during exercise, remaining elevated during recovery (F ‐ EndRec: 0.27 ± 0.04, P<0.01, M ‐ EndRec: 0.21 ± 0.05 a.u., P≤0.03). T device decreased in F (Pre: 27.4 ± 0.9; EndEx: 6.1 ± 6.1°C, P≤0.01) and M (Pre: 27.3 ± 1.5; EndEx: 11.8 ± 10.5°C, P≤0.01) during exercise, returning to PreEx 20 min into recovery (F: 20.1 ± 8.0, P≥0.09; M: 19.1 ± 9.2°C, P≥0.06). During exercise, T core (51 ± 25%) contributed to T device more than T skin in M (13 ± 8%, P=0.05), but neither were different to w skin (36 ± 25%, P≥0.37). In F, T core (31 ± 26%), T skin (35 ± 31%) and w skin (34 ± 24%) contributed equally to T device (P≥0.98). During recovery, T core (55 ± 21%) contributed more than T skin (17 ± 13%, P=0.02) in F, but neither were different to w skin (28 ± 20%, P≥0.15). In M, T core (37 ± 35%), T skin (27 ± 23%) and w skin (36 ± 22%) contributed equally to T device (P≥0.84). Conclusions Thermal behavior during and post‐exercise does not differ between M and F. However, T core contributes more to thermal behavior during exercise in M and post‐exercise in F. These findings may be related to temporal differences in T skin during and following exercise. Support or Funding Information Supported by lululemon athletica inc. This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .