Abstract:The prevalence of childhood obesity is increasing globally (1) . While BMI is commonly used to define obesity, it is unable to differentiate between fat and muscle mass, leading to calls to measure body composition specifically (2) . While several tools are available to assess body composition in infancy, it is unclear if they are directly comparable. Among a subset of healthy infants born to mothers participating in a randomised controlled trial of a preconception and antenatal nutritional supplement (3) , measurements were made at ages 6 weeks (n = 58) and 6 months (n = 70) using air displacement plethysmography (ADP), whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS). Estimates of percentage fat mass (%FM) were compared using Cohen's kappa statistic (κ) and Bland-Altman analysis (4,5) . There was none to weak agreement when comparing tertiles of %FM (κ = 0.15–0.59). When comparing absolute values, the bias (i.e., mean difference) was smallest when comparing BIS to ADP at 6 weeks (+1.7%). A similar bias was observed at 6 months when comparing DXA to ADP (+1.8%). However, when comparing BIA to DXA at both ages, biases were much larger (+7.6% and +4.7% at 6 weeks and 6 months, respectively). Furthermore, there was wide interindividual variance (limits of agreement [LOA] i.e., ± 1.96 SD) for each comparison. At 6 weeks, LOA ranged from ± 4.8 to ± 6.5% for BIA vs. DXA and BIA vs. ADP, respectively. At 6 months, LOA were even wider, ranging from ± 7.3 to ± 8.1% (DXA vs. ADP and BIA vs. DXA, respectively). Proportional biases were apparent when comparing BIS to the other tools at both ages, with BIS generally overestimating %FM more among infants with low adiposity. In addition to differences according to tool type, within-tool factors impacted body composition estimation. For ADP measurements, the choice of FFM density reference (Fomon vs. Butte) had minimal impact; however, choice of DXA software version (GE Lunar enCORE basic vs. enhanced) and BIS analysis approach (empirical equation vs. mixture theory prediction) led to very different estimates of body composition. In conclusion, when comparing body composition assessment tools in infancy, there was limited agreement between three commonly used tools. Therefore, researchers and clinicians must be cautious when conducting longitudinal analyses or when comparing findings across studies, as estimates are not comparable across tools.

Comparison of Several Prediction Equations Using Skinfold Thickness for Estimating Percentage Body Fat vs. Body Fat Percentage Determined by BIA in 6-8-Year-Old South African Children: The BC-IT Study

Validity of bioelectrical impedance measurement in predicting fat-free mass of Chinese children and adolescents.

Validity of Four Commercial Bioelectrical Impedance Scales in Measuring Body Fat among Chinese Children and Adolescents

Development and Validation of Body Fat Prediction Equation in 20-69 Adults

Body fat percentage assessment by skinfold equation, bioimpedance and densitometry in older adults

Comparisons of body-composition prediction accuracy: a study of 2 bioelectric impedance consumer devices in healthy Chinese persons using DXA and MRI as criteria methods.

Validation of skinfold equations and alternative methods for the determination of fat-free mass in young athletes

Field Methods For Body Composition Assessment Are Valid In Healthy Chinese Adults

New bioelectrical impedance analysis equations for children and adolescents based on the deuterium dilution technique

Comparison of body composition assessment tools in infancy

Development and validation of new bioelectrical impedance equations to accurately estimate fat mass percentage in a heterogeneous Caucasian population

Comparison of two bioelectrical impedance analysis devices with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and magnetic resonance imaging in the estimation of body composition.

The Development and Validation of New Equations for Estimating Body Fat Percentage among Chinese Men and Women

Comparison of body composition measures assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the United Kingdom Biobank

A comparison of bioelectrical impedance analysis and air displacement plethysmography to assess body composition in children

Machine learning-based equations for improved body composition estimation in Indian adults

High-standard predictive equations for estimating body composition using bioelectrical impedance analysis: a systematic review

Methods to Assess Fat Mass in Infants and Young Children: A Comparative Study Using Skinfold Thickness and Air-Displacement Plethysmography

Ethnic Specific body fat percent prediction equation as surrogate marker of obesity in Ethiopian adults

The Performance of Five Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Prediction Equations against Dual X-ray Absorptiometry in Estimating Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass in an Adult Australian Population

Comparison of four quick and reliable methods of assessing body fat appropriate for clinical settings among young, middle-age, and older healthy male and female adults