Differences In Body-fat Percentage Induced By Applying Two Common Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Instruments

Guoyuan Huang,Youqing Shen,Chase Smith,Brent Summers,Yong Tai Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000983212.59084.8a

2023-01-01

Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Abstract:PURPOSE: Instrumentation is an important factor that influences the accuracy when estimating body fat (%BF). Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a simple, relatively inexpensive technique to measure %BF. Hand-to-Hand (H-BIA) and Foot-to-Foot (F-BIA) devices are widely used to assess fitness of body composition. In a study of Japanese men, the mean difference was found between the measured %BF values by applying H-BIA and F-BIA analyzers. This study aimed to investigate if there are differences in %BF estimates measured by the two BIA instruments among middle-school and college students. METHODS: For study one, 146 (boy = 71; girl = 75) 6th-grade students (age 11-13 yr) participated. For study two, 49 male college students (age 18-24 yr) were included, with 20 from Kinesiology (KIN) and 29 from Non-KIN majors. All subjects signed the informed consent before intervention. The %BF measures were taken by using Omron H-BIA and F-BIA Analyzers. Pearson's method was used to examine correlations. Differences in variables were tested using independent t-test. Values are presented as means±SD. An alpha level for significance was set at P ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: For study one, there was a high relationship between %BF estimates from two devices for girl-group (r = 0.75, p < 0.001), but a low relationship for boy-group (r = 0.41, p < 0.001). Significant differences between two %BF values (p < 0.001) were noted only in the boy-group. For study two, a very high relationship was observed between %BF estimates from two devices for KIN group (r = 0.851, p < 0.0001), but a low relationship for Non-KIN students (r = 0.226, p = 0.238). Significant differences were found between two %BF values measured by H-BIA and F-BIA, with 7.84 ± 4.80%, t = 7.297 (p < 0.0001) for KIN group, and 10.19 ± 6.76%, t = 8.117 (p < 0.0001) for Non-KIN, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Study one results indicated that %BF estimates were much higher by using the H-BIA than the F-BIA in the male middle-school students, but almost identical for the corresponding female students. Study two results indicated that regardless of the male college student’s major, %BF estimates were much higher by using the F-BIA than the H-BIA. It is important to consider variability of %BF estimates while using the two different BIA instruments.