Abstract:We read with interest the article by Sung et al.1Kwon J. Sung K.R. Han S. et al.Subclassification of primary angle closure using anterior segment optical coherence tomography and ultrasound biomicroscopic parameters.Ophthalmology. 2017; 124: 1039-1047Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (23) Google Scholar In this observational study, the authors concluded that the most distinct difference between the 2 subgroups in the cluster analysis was trabecular–ciliary process angle (TCA) and that the position of the ciliary body is important in subclassifying primary angle closure. However, there are several limitations that may affect the results. First, in the study, the authors reported that gonioscopy and image analysis using ImageJ was all conducted by a single researcher. These 2 measurements, however, both can be influenced by observers' subjectivity. To reduce influence from observers' subjectivity, we have to repeat measurement by a second or even a third observer, and take their mean value as the final data. Also, only chamber angle of temporal and nasal quadrants were captured. Superior and inferior quadrants were not recorded, which may also cause bias of data. Second, in Figure 1B,1Kwon J. Sung K.R. Han S. et al.Subclassification of primary angle closure using anterior segment optical coherence tomography and ultrasound biomicroscopic parameters.Ophthalmology. 2017; 124: 1039-1047Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (23) Google Scholar the superior surface of ciliary process overlaps with inferior surface of iris. In this situation, it is hard to measure the TCA because one cannot define the boundary of superior surface of ciliary process. Third, in the discussion, the percentage of intraocular pressure reduction was significantly lower in the cluster with a smaller TCA, suggesting that laser peripheral iridotomy is less effective in this group of eyes. Actually, TCA in this study was measured after laser peripheral iridotomy. A change in TCA may be caused by laser peripheral iridotomy. So it may be inappropriate to say, “The percentage of [intraocular pressure] reduction was significantly lower in the cluster with a smaller TCA.” Subclassification of Primary Angle Closure Using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasound Biomicroscopic ParametersOphthalmologyVol. 124Issue 7PreviewTo classify eyes with primary angle closure (PAC) in terms of the features visualized using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM). Full-Text PDF ReplyOphthalmologyVol. 124Issue 10PreviewWe greatly appreciate the interest Dr Li has shown in our article.1 We agree with the first comment that examinations can be influenced by observers' subjectivity. However, examinations can also be influenced by interexaminer variability if multiple examiners perform the analysis. Lin et al2 reported that interexaminer measurements related to the ciliary process were variable and recommended that measurement should be performed by the same observer. Hence, both approaches have pros and cons. Our previous study showed excellent intraexaminer intraclass correlation coefficient values between 0.933 and 0.951 using anterior segment OCT images. Full-Text PDF

Classification of Primary Angle Closure Disease by Hierarchical Cluster Analysis of Ocular Biometrics in the Dark and Light

Ocular Biometric Determinants of Dark-to-Light Change in Angle Width: The Chinese American Eye Study

The anterior and posterior biometric characteristics in primary angle-closure disease: Data based on anterior segment optical coherence tomography and swept-source optical coherence tomography

Comparison of Ocular Biometry Between Eyes with Chronic Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma and Their Fellow Eyes with Primary Angle-Closure or Primary Angle-Closure Suspect

Ocular Biometry of Primary Angle-Closure Disease in Younger Patients

Biometric Differences Between Unilateral Chronic Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma and Fellow Non-Glaucomatous Eyes

Novel Discoveries of Anterior Segment Parameters in Fellow Eyes of Acute Primary Angle Closure and Chronic Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma

Direct observation and measurement of circumlental space and its relation to anterior chamber angle characteristics in iridotomized phakic eyes with primary angle closure disease

Re: Kwon Et Al.: Subclassification of Primary Angle Closure Using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasound Biomicroscopic Parameters (ophthalmology. 2017;124:1039-1047).

Characterization of Ocular Biometrics and Aqueous Humor Dynamics in Primary Angle Closure Suspects

Biometric indicators of eyes with occult lens subluxation inducing secondary acute angle closure

Integration of Genetic and Biometric Risk Factors for Detection of Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma

Analysis of Indicators for Assessing the Risk of Progression from PACS to APAC and the Degree of Intraocular Pressure Elevation in APAC Using AS-OCT

[Detection of the anterior segment configuration of primary angle-closure glaucoma by anterior segment optical coherence tomography].

Correlation between choroidal parameters and primary angle-closure suspect in different age groups

Relationship between central corneal thickness and inter‐eye disease severity in primary angle closure glaucoma

Relationship Between Ocular Biometry and Severity of Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma: Relevance for Predictive, Preventive, and Personalized Medicine

Relationship between anterior segment biometry and primary angle-closure glaucoma in Hubei region: a retrospective case-control study

Long-Term Risk and Prediction of Progression in Primary Angle Closure Suspect

Comparison of intraocular pressure and anterior segment parameters in subjects with asymmetrical primary angle closure disease

Choroidal Physiology and Primary Angle Closure Disease