A five year follow up survery of primary angle closure suspect

Zhi-jiang SHAO,Zhi-zheng SUN,Chuan-yi SHI
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-8422.2011.06.005
2011-01-01
Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology
Abstract:Objective To investigate the timing of laser peripheral iridotomy(LPI)for the treatment of primary angle closure(PACS).Methods A total of 126 patients(252 eyes) diagnosed with PACS were enrolled.There were 77 females(154 eyes) and 49 males(98 eyes).Mean age of the patients was 61±4.53 years(range,47~79 years).The main criteria for diagnosis of PACS were:1.no history of attack,signs and symptoms of acute PACG;2.normal intraocular pressure;3.the depth of peripheral anterior chamber≤1/4CK;4.narrow angle width(gradeⅡ or less,Shaffer'S grading system);5.no iris-trabecular contact demonstrated by compression gonioscopy;6.no glaucomatous optic nerve damage and visual field defect.The patients were re-examined every 3 months.The average follow-up was longer than 5 years.Results 35 of 252 eyes with PACS develop into PAC.prevalence of PAC was 13.9%(35/252).Conclusion Not all patients with PACS develop PAC.In patients with any of the following features,PACS is easy to develop into PAC,and prophylactic iridotomy may be indicated in these situations:(1)Critically narrow angle(grade Ⅰor less);(2)The adhesion of angle gradually develops;(3)Narrow angle with positive dark room test;(4)Narrow angle with a well-documented family history of PACG;(5)Narrow angle with history of previous angle-closure attacks;(6)Need for repeated pupillary dilation and extensive retinal treatment(e.g.,panretinal photocoagulation for abetic retinopathy);(7)Hyperopia with senile cataract;(8)Younger patients,especially those who live in urban area away from medical care.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?