Abstract:Aim: To better understand the views and experiences of experienced doctoral supervisors in nursing when providing feedback and critique to nursing doctoral students. Background: Feedback refers to information from a provider, intended to inform a receiver about the quality of their work in order for them to be able to see where improvements might occur and to signpost issues to be carried into future work. Feedback, particularly on student writing is central to successful doctoral supervision and is time consuming and labour-intensive for supervisors. Design: Qualitative. Methods: Following ethics approval and informed consent procedures, we gathered 962 min of interview data over a six-week period from 21 participants in four countries. During conversational-style interviews, participants shared their experiences of supervisionand elucidated on their experiences of providing feedback to doctoral students. Data were thematically analysed. Findings: Participants had more than 400 combined doctoral completions. As supervisors, participants aimed to strike a balance between helpful and empowering comments that motivated students to approach their work with renewed vigour and enthusiasm; and those that had the opposite effect of crushing and demoralising the student. 'Feedback as a balancing act' comprised four contributing themes with sub-themes. Findings reveal that feedback on student writing can remain a challenge for the duration of candidature. However, writing is an essential aspect of doctoral studies. It is through supervision that new nursing scholars are tutored and coached into the practices essential to creating disciplinary knowledge through writing. Our sample was drawn from multiple countries and included perspectives from various cultures. Despite the variation in countries and cultures, there was little variation in issues around feedback with all participants striving to provide clear, respectful feedback aimed at developing students and enhancing their skills. Conclusions: Supervision of doctoral student frequently involves working internationally and what while our sample was drawn from multiple countries and cultural perspectives, there was little variation in issues around provision of feedback to doctoral students. When considering feedback, our findings emphasise the importance of recognising feedback as a crucial educative process and one that is central to the production of a doctoral thesis. We argue that there is a need for nursing to move to developing and articulating meaningful and inclusive pedagogies of writing and doctoral supervision. We recommend universities support the development of such pedagogies and ensure that academic staff engaging in supervision are supported with the appropriate knowledge and skills to be optimally effective.

Supervisory feedback, reflection, and academic discourse socialization: Insights from an L2 doctoral student's paper writing experience

Supervisory Feedback on Chinese Doctoral Students' Drafts of a Research Article

Feedback Engagement of Chinese International Doctoral Students

Feedback seeking and student reflective feedback literacy: a sociocultural discourse analysis

Agency and feedback-seeking: academic English socialization of L2 students in Hong Kong

Feedback as a balancing act: Qualitative insights from an experienced multi-cultural sample of doctoral supervisors in nursing

‘Ignoring me is part of learning’: Supervisory feedback on doctoral writing

Exploring student engagement with supervisor feedback on master’s thesis: Insights from a case study

Student feedback literacy in L2 disciplinary writing: insights from international graduate students at a UK university

Giving and receiving written feedback on research reports: a narrative review and guidance for supervisors and students

How doctoral students and graduates describe facilitating experiences and strategies for their thesis writing learning process: a qualitative approach

A qualitative inquiry into undergraduates’ learning from giving and receiving peer feedback in L2 writing: Insights from a case study

Supervisory feedback across disciplines: does it meet students’ expectations?

Developing a distance-based doctoral supervisory model: Inquiry over disrupted trajectories

Feedback, feedback-on-feedback and re-feedback: effects of written dialogic peer feedback on English as a foreign language writing

The development of student feedback literacy: the influences of teacher feedback on peer feedback

‘Only true friends could be cruelly honest’: cognitive scaffolding and social-affective support in teacher feedback literacy

Longitudinal perspectives on students’ experiences of feedback: a need for teacher–student partnerships

Teacher-written feedback in L2 writing education: Insights into student tensions and responses

Understanding student engagement with peer feedback on master’s theses: a Macau study

Understanding How Chinese University Students Engage with Teacher Written Feedback in an EFL Context: A Multiple Case Study