Abstract:Aim: To better understand the views and experiences of experienced doctoral supervisors in nursing when providing feedback and critique to nursing doctoral students. Background: Feedback refers to information from a provider, intended to inform a receiver about the quality of their work in order for them to be able to see where improvements might occur and to signpost issues to be carried into future work. Feedback, particularly on student writing is central to successful doctoral supervision and is time consuming and labour-intensive for supervisors. Design: Qualitative. Methods: Following ethics approval and informed consent procedures, we gathered 962 min of interview data over a six-week period from 21 participants in four countries. During conversational-style interviews, participants shared their experiences of supervisionand elucidated on their experiences of providing feedback to doctoral students. Data were thematically analysed. Findings: Participants had more than 400 combined doctoral completions. As supervisors, participants aimed to strike a balance between helpful and empowering comments that motivated students to approach their work with renewed vigour and enthusiasm; and those that had the opposite effect of crushing and demoralising the student. 'Feedback as a balancing act' comprised four contributing themes with sub-themes. Findings reveal that feedback on student writing can remain a challenge for the duration of candidature. However, writing is an essential aspect of doctoral studies. It is through supervision that new nursing scholars are tutored and coached into the practices essential to creating disciplinary knowledge through writing. Our sample was drawn from multiple countries and included perspectives from various cultures. Despite the variation in countries and cultures, there was little variation in issues around feedback with all participants striving to provide clear, respectful feedback aimed at developing students and enhancing their skills. Conclusions: Supervision of doctoral student frequently involves working internationally and what while our sample was drawn from multiple countries and cultural perspectives, there was little variation in issues around provision of feedback to doctoral students. When considering feedback, our findings emphasise the importance of recognising feedback as a crucial educative process and one that is central to the production of a doctoral thesis. We argue that there is a need for nursing to move to developing and articulating meaningful and inclusive pedagogies of writing and doctoral supervision. We recommend universities support the development of such pedagogies and ensure that academic staff engaging in supervision are supported with the appropriate knowledge and skills to be optimally effective.

How doctoral students and graduates describe facilitating experiences and strategies for their thesis writing learning process: a qualitative approach

Feedback as a balancing act: Qualitative insights from an experienced multi-cultural sample of doctoral supervisors in nursing

How to survive (and enjoy) doing a thesis: the experiences of a methodological working group

‘Ignoring me is part of learning’: Supervisory feedback on doctoral writing

Supervisory feedback, reflection, and academic discourse socialization: Insights from an L2 doctoral student's paper writing experience

Exploring Postgraduate students’ challenges and strategy use while writing a master’s thesis in an English-medium University in Kazakhstan

Exploring student engagement with supervisor feedback on master’s thesis: Insights from a case study

Capturing the Struggle: Understanding the metacognitive strategies for academic writing of mature, work-based learners at University

Feedback Seeking by First-Year Chinese International Students: Understanding Practices and Challenges

Longitudinal perspectives on students’ experiences of feedback: a need for teacher–student partnerships

Ensuring Sustainable Academic Development of L2 Postgraduate Students and MA Programs: Challenges and Support in Thesis Writing for L2 Chinese Postgraduate Students

Problems and Strategies in Developing Writing Undergraduate Thesis: A Study in EFL Students

Feedback Engagement of Chinese International Doctoral Students

The Solutions of Writing Undergraduate Thesis: A Narrative Inquiry Case Study

Teacher-written feedback in L2 writing education: Insights into student tensions and responses

Teaching writing to ESL graduate students: A model and an illustration

Student Reflections on Learning in a Doctoral-Level Writing Course

Supervising master’s theses in international master’s degree programmes: roles, responsibilities and models

Understanding student engagement with peer feedback on master’s theses: a Macau study

Academic writing challenges faced by chemistry doctoral students: A self-study informed by three writing theories

Graduate Students’ Perspectives on Challenges Encountered in Research Work in Higher Education: The Kenya Experience