Abstract:Aim: To better understand the views and experiences of experienced doctoral supervisors in nursing when providing feedback and critique to nursing doctoral students. Background: Feedback refers to information from a provider, intended to inform a receiver about the quality of their work in order for them to be able to see where improvements might occur and to signpost issues to be carried into future work. Feedback, particularly on student writing is central to successful doctoral supervision and is time consuming and labour-intensive for supervisors. Design: Qualitative. Methods: Following ethics approval and informed consent procedures, we gathered 962 min of interview data over a six-week period from 21 participants in four countries. During conversational-style interviews, participants shared their experiences of supervisionand elucidated on their experiences of providing feedback to doctoral students. Data were thematically analysed. Findings: Participants had more than 400 combined doctoral completions. As supervisors, participants aimed to strike a balance between helpful and empowering comments that motivated students to approach their work with renewed vigour and enthusiasm; and those that had the opposite effect of crushing and demoralising the student. 'Feedback as a balancing act' comprised four contributing themes with sub-themes. Findings reveal that feedback on student writing can remain a challenge for the duration of candidature. However, writing is an essential aspect of doctoral studies. It is through supervision that new nursing scholars are tutored and coached into the practices essential to creating disciplinary knowledge through writing. Our sample was drawn from multiple countries and included perspectives from various cultures. Despite the variation in countries and cultures, there was little variation in issues around feedback with all participants striving to provide clear, respectful feedback aimed at developing students and enhancing their skills. Conclusions: Supervision of doctoral student frequently involves working internationally and what while our sample was drawn from multiple countries and cultural perspectives, there was little variation in issues around provision of feedback to doctoral students. When considering feedback, our findings emphasise the importance of recognising feedback as a crucial educative process and one that is central to the production of a doctoral thesis. We argue that there is a need for nursing to move to developing and articulating meaningful and inclusive pedagogies of writing and doctoral supervision. We recommend universities support the development of such pedagogies and ensure that academic staff engaging in supervision are supported with the appropriate knowledge and skills to be optimally effective.

Feedback Engagement of Chinese International Doctoral Students

Supervisory Feedback on Chinese Doctoral Students' Drafts of a Research Article

Feedback as a balancing act: Qualitative insights from an experienced multi-cultural sample of doctoral supervisors in nursing

Student feedback literacy and engagement with feedback: a case study of Chinese undergraduate students

Feedback Seeking by First-Year Chinese International Students: Understanding Practices and Challenges

Student feedback literacy in L2 disciplinary writing: insights from international graduate students at a UK university

Influence of Culture on Chinese University Students' Interaction with Feedback

Understanding How Chinese University Students Engage with Teacher Written Feedback in an EFL Context: A Multiple Case Study

‘Ignoring me is part of learning’: Supervisory feedback on doctoral writing

Understanding student engagement with peer feedback on master’s theses: a Macau study

Exploring student engagement with supervisor feedback on master’s thesis: Insights from a case study

Chinese International Students’ Identity (re)construction Mediated by Teacher Feedback: Through the Lens of Academic Discourse Socialisation

Student engagement with teacher written feedback: Insights from low-proficiency and high-proficiency L2 learners

Supervisory feedback across disciplines: does it meet students’ expectations?

Promoting student engagement with feedback: insights from collaborative pedagogy and teacher feedback

Student Engagement with Written Feedback: Critical Issues and Way Forward

Examining Students’ Responses to Teacher Translation Feedback: Insights From the Perspective of Student Engagement

The Role of Feedback in Cross-Cultural Learning: A Case Study of Chinese Taught Postgraduate Students in A Uk University

The Influences of International Master’s Students’ Feedback Seeking Behaviour on Their Feedback Literacy and Feedback Contexts: an Ecological Perspective

Supervisory feedback, reflection, and academic discourse socialization: Insights from an L2 doctoral student's paper writing experience

Feedback, feedback-on-feedback and re-feedback: effects of written dialogic peer feedback on English as a foreign language writing