An in-depth evaluation of surface characteristics and key machining responses in WEDM of aerospace alloy under varying electric discharge environments

Muhammad Usman,Kashif Ishfaq,Muhammad Rehan,Abbas Raza,Jabir Mumtaz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10608-2
2022-12-15
Abstract:Titanium and its alloys (especially Ti6Al4V) are widely employed in aerospace and biomedical industry. Wire electric discharge machining is common in practice to machine this difficult-to-cut material. But owing to the thermo-electric nature of the process, it is challenging to have adequate level of surface integrity. This primary concern needs to be addressed as it mainly influences the surface mechanical characteristics. Therefore, the present research aims to address the aforesaid issues using well-known multipass strategy. Understanding the multipass process dynamics and requirements, the potentiality of brass wire diameters was comprehensively examined and explored during WEDM of Ti6Al4V. Considering higher cost, unavailability, environmental hazards, and straightness issues of novel zinc-coated wire electrodes, readily available brass wires provide a cheaper and widely acceptable solution to enhance surface integrity of machined parts if equivalent results can be somehow made possible. For that sake, three different brass wire diameters; 0.15 mm, 0.2 mm, and 0.25 mm have been considered to evaluate their impact on surface roughness, recast layer thickness, overcut, machined surface microhardness, and cutting speed using multipass cutting technique. Experimental results revealed that 0.15 mm uncoated brass wire can produce white layer result equivalent to Topas Plus X wire (Cu core-double Zn-rich layer coating) which outperformed among all zinc-coated wires used in previously published research. Moreover, among different diameter brass wires, surface roughness is improved by 25% using multipass cutting with 0.15 mm diameter in comparison to its counterparts. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis depicts that the said combination reduces recast layer thickness from 39.04 μm to 14.6 μm (~ 1.5 times lesser value). In addition to that, smaller diameter (0.15 mm) provides the maximum cutting rate in rough cuts (which consume maximum machining time) and dimensional accuracy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?