Abstract:Design Systematic reviewStudy population Orthodontic patients undergoing treatment with removable thermoplastic retainers compared with conventional fixed orthodontic appliances. The mean age of patients was between 15 and 33 years. Data sources Six electronic databases including: Scopus, Web-of-Science, PubMed, Cochrane, Clinical Trials and Grey Literature were searched in addition to a search of references in eligible studies with no restriction of language. Out of 559 studies, 55 were eligible. Only four articles were included; three non-randomised and one randomised controlled trial (RCT) involving 96-182 patients. The studies included were completed within 2005-2016.Study selection Clinical trials involving orthodontic patients undergoing treatment using thermoplastic removeable aligners, namely Invisalign, in comparison to conventional fixed orthodontic appliances of either self-ligating or tip-edge bracket systems were included.Data extraction and synthesis Two members of the research team independently selected articles which fulfilled the inclusion criteria and compared results prior to data collection. A third party examiner was available to resolve disagreements. The study quality was analysed for presence of bias; three non-randomised studies were evaluated and scored using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies (MINORS), one study was considered high methodological quality, two were considered moderate. The RCT was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration Common Scheme for Bias and was deemed to be low risk of bias. Results The results suggest that Invisalign can provide successful alignment, however, it poses difficulties in achieving occlusal contacts, buccolingual inclination and vertical movement of teeth. One study found that Invisalign cases are more susceptible to relapse, which can be explained through the tipping mechanism compared to bodily movement, of conventional fixed appliances. Furthermore some studies show that although using aligners can result in overall shorter treatment time the final occlusion was not favourable. The outcome of the RCT, showed that aligners can be successful in treating class I malocclusions in extraction cases.Conclusions This systematic review found that the use of clear aligners made no significant difference to treatment time compared with conventional appliances. Additionally, removable aligners were effective in crowding cases but had limitations in achieving favourable outcomes in the anterior-posterior position and final occlusion, as well as being more likely to relapse post treatment.

Do orthodontic treatments using fixed appliances and clear aligner achieve comparable quality of occlusal contacts?

Evaluation and Comparative Assessment of Clear Aligners and Conventional Appliances on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Pediatric Populations: a Cross-Sectional Study.

A comparison of treatment effectiveness between clear aligner and fixed appliance therapies

Is the quality of occlusal contacts comparable after aligner and fixed orthodontic therapy? A non-randomized cohort comparison using computerized occlusal analysis during 6 months of retention

Are clear aligners as effective as conventional fixed appliances?

Treatment Satisfaction and Quality of Life Changes in Patients Receiving Conventional Fixed Orthodontic Appliances and Clear Aligner Therapy: A Questionnaire Based Cross-sectional Study

Comparison of Patient Satisfaction between Invisible Appliance and Fixed Orthodontic Appliances - A Systematic Review

Treatment effectiveness of young adults using clear aligners versus buccal fixed appliances in class I malocclusion with first premolar extraction using the ABO-Objective Grading System: A randomized controlled clinical trial

The Effect of Treatment With Clear Aligners Versus Fixed Appliances on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Severe Crowding: A One-Year Follow-Up Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Treatment Effectiveness of Clear Aligners in Correcting Complicated and Severe Malocclusion Cases Compared to Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A Systematic Review

Comparison of fixed braces and clear braces for malocclusion treatment

Comparison of Short-Term Oral Impacts Experienced by Patients Treated with Invisalign or Conventional Fixed Orthodontic Appliances

Does Clear Aligner Treatment Result in Different Patient Perceptions of Treatment Process and Outcomes Compared to Conventional/Traditional Fixed Appliance Treatment: A Literature Review

Cephalometric evaluation of changes in vertical dimension and molar position in adult non-extraction treatment with clear aligners and traditional fixed appliances

Occlusal contact changes in patients treated with clear aligners: A retrospective evaluation using digital dental models

Efficiency of clear aligners vs fixed appliances: A narrative review

Comparative assessment of the clinical outcomes of clear aligners compared to fixed appliance in class II malocclusion

Comparison of pain intensity and impacts on oral health-related quality of life between orthodontic patients treated with clear aligners and fixed appliances: a systematic review and meta-analysis

[Clear aligner in orthodontic retreatment]

Risk of root resorption between Invisalign and fixed orthodontic treatment: A retrospective study

Does orthodontic treatment using clear aligners and fixed appliances affect periodontal status differently?