An Assessment of Individual Preference for a Novel Capillary Blood Collection System
Shirin Pourafshar,Monisha Parikh,Bilal Abdallah,Nasrin Al Thubian,James Jacobson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s437969
2024-03-02
Patient Preference and Adherence
Abstract:Shirin Pourafshar, 1 Monisha Parikh, 2 Bilal Abdallah, 2 Nasrin Al Thubian, 3 James W Jacobson 4 1 Medical Affairs, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Sparks, MD, USA; 2 Medical Affairs, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA; 3 Medical Affairs, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada; 4 Clinical Affairs, Babson Diagnostics, Austin, TX, USA Correspondence: James W Jacobson, Vice President of Clinical Affairs, Babson Diagnostics, 1321 Rutherford Ln, Bldg 2, Ste 200, Austin, TX, 78753, USA, Tel +1-888-556-8785, Fax +1-512-277-3206, Email Purpose: Typical barriers to venous blood collection for wellness testing include discomfort, time spent, and collection site accessibility. This study assessed individuals' experience, satisfaction, and preference associated with a FDA-cleared blood-collection device, the BD MiniDrawTM Capillary Blood Collection System (BD MiniDraw), in retail locations. Patients and Methods: A total of 113 individuals (≥ 18 years) with venous blood collection experience were enrolled; 107 completed the study. A pre-collection survey gathered information on demographics and past experiences with healthcare and venous blood collection settings. BD MiniDraw collection was conducted at three retail sites (two pharmacies and one grocery store) by trained healthcare workers using the Babson BetterWay blood testing service model. A follow up survey was performed two weeks later to determine experience with, and preference for, BD MiniDraw in terms of staff professionalism, blood collection location, blood collection time, and staff trustworthiness. Results: Among the 107 participants, 74 (69%) were female and 33 (31%) were male; the mean age was 49 years (range=18– 71 years). Sixty-six (62%) participants viewed their prior venipuncture experience as "somewhat" or "very" positive. Following capillary collection, 96 (90%) participants expressed a "somewhat" or "very" positive experience with BD MiniDraw at a retail location. In particular, "very satisfied" responses were given for location (87/107; 81%) and collection time (78/1407; 73%). In a subset of respondents (n=89), those reasons (location and time savings) were most frequent for likelihood of future use. Ninety-nine participants (92%) rated the retail blood collection team as "very" or "extremely" trustworthy. Overall, 90 participants (84%) "strongly preferred" (56/107; 52%), "somewhat preferred" (14/107; 13%), or had "no preference" (20/107; 19%) for BD MiniDraw, compared to traditional venous blood collection. Conclusion: Most participants conveyed a preference for BD MiniDraw, primarily based on the blood collection retail location, perceived time savings, and professionalism and trustworthiness of the staff. Keywords: capillary blood collection, phlebotomy, patient preference, blood specimen collection, patient satisfaction Blood testing is often used to facilitate health screening and to diagnose or monitor disease. 1–3 Blood tests commonly performed as part of wellness testing include the complete blood count (CBC), and serum chemistry tests, such as a comprehensive metabolic panel, lipid panel, and thyroid function tests. CBC measures the types and numbers of cells in the blood, and helps identify patients at risk for a wide range of conditions, such as anemia, infection, and leukemia. 1 The comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) is used to analyze blood chemistry and can help diagnose and monitor chronic conditions, including diabetes and kidney disease. 4 Venipuncture is typically performed to collect blood specimens for CBC, CMP, and other tests. Although common, it requires a skilled phlebotomist or nurse and dedicated healthcare infrastructure (eg, health care provider office, blood collection service center), and is frequently associated with some level of discomfort and bruising (up to 45% of patients) for the patient. 5–7 Capillary blood collection is accomplished through a tiny skin puncture and holds several perceived advantages over venipuncture as a blood collection approach. 8–10 It is less invasive and has been shown to be less painful; 11 it also requires smaller amounts of blood (for CBC and CMP testing), and can be performed relatively quickly. In addition, capillary blood collection could be a viable option for individuals with difficult venous access. 12 These include oncology, geriatric, and pediatric patients, or any other patients with hard to access or fragile blood vessels. 13–15 In addition, capillary blood collection in ancillary healthcare settings (ie, retail stores) may help improve health care accessibility and reduce the ti -Abstract Truncated-
medicine, general & internal