Abstract:BackgroundShock affects one-third of patients admitted to intensive care and is associated with increased mortality. Vasopressor medications are used to maintain blood pressure in shock. Central venous catheters are associated with serious complications and pose logistical difficulties for insertion. Delivery of vasopressors via peripheral intravenous cannula may be a safe alternative.MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study comparing safety profile and outcomes of vasopressor delivery via peripheral and central routes in critically ill patients over a 12-month period in a mixed medical-surgical intensive care unit. Demographics, clinical characteristics, treatments, and safety outcome data were extracted from medical records. Patients were classified into three groups: vasopressor infusions via peripheral intravenous cannula, combined peripheral intravenous cannula followed by central venous catheter, and central venous catheter only. Groups were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. The impact of duration of vasopressor infusion on complication rates was assessed using logistic regression.ResultsWe identified 212 patients who received vasopressor infusion, 39 received via peripheral only (Group 1), 155 via peripheral followed by central (Group 2), and 18 via central only (Group 3). There were some baseline differences between groups. Group 1 had the lowest median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score (64, interquartile range = 44–77), and Group 3, the highest (86, interquartile range = 57–101). Duration of vasopressor infusion was shortest in Group 1 and longer in Groups 2 and 3. There were no major complications; however, minor complications such as leakage, extravasation, and erythema occurred in 41% of Group 1 and 28% of Group 2 patients. Duration of peripheral vasopressor infusion was not associated with an increased risk of complications.ConclusionsAdministration of vasopressor infusions for short duration in critically ill patients via a peripheral venous cannula may be feasible, with low rates of complications, and offers a safe alternative to central venous access.

Prehospital central venous catheters

Current Practice in Central Venous Catheterization

Clinical practice guidelines for the management of central venous catheter for critically ill patients

Prospective Study Evaluating Whether Standard Peripheral Intravenous Catheters Can Be Used for Blood Collection Throughout Hospital Stay

Prediction of Extended Period of Vasopressor Infusion Requiring Central Venous Catheterisation: A Burning Issue in Critical Care

Blood Product Administration in the Prehospital Setting: A Scoping Review

Peripheral Intravenous Administration of High-Risk Infusions in Critical Care: A Risk-Benefit Analysis

[At the heart of central venous lines : between complications and solutions]

Efficacy and safety of peripherally inserted central venous catheters in acute cardiac care management

Challenges in using central venous access devices outside of ICU settings in pediatrics

What's new in whole blood resuscitation? In the trauma bay and beyond

More sophisticated than a drink cooler or an old sphygmomanometer but still not adequate for prehospital blood: A market review of commercially available equipment for prehospital blood transport and administration

Two Cases of Malpositioning of Internal Jugular Central Venous Catheters: A Review of Literature and Current Treatment Recommendations

Safety and efficacy of peripheral versus centrally administered vasopressor infusion: A single-centre retrospective observational study

Central venous accesses in prone position during the pandemic period: A narrative review

Intravascular catheter-related infections: new horizons and recent advances

Central Venous Catheter Complications in the Poisoning Emergency Center: A 5-Year Cross-Sectional Study

Strategies to Obtain and Deliver Blood Products Into Critically Injured Children

Successful management of fatal cardiac tamponade resulting from intravascular intervention for central vein occlusion in hemodialysis patients: A case report

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE USE OF A CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER AND A CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER PERIPHERAL INSERTION: ADVANTAGES, DISADVANTAGES AND RISK FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH EACH PROCEDURE

Resuscitative practices and the use of low-titer group O whole blood in pediatric trauma