Artificial intelligence as a prediction tool for orthognathic surgery assessment
Pedro Henrique José de Oliveira,Tengfei Li,Haoyue Li,João Roberto Gonçalves,Ary Santos‐Pinto,Luiz Gonzaga Gandini Junior,Lucia Soares Cevidanes,Claudia Toyama,Guilherme Paladini Feltrin,Antonio Augusto Campanha,Melchiades Alves de Oliveira Junior,Jonas Bianchi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12805
2024-05-08
Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research
Abstract:Introduction An ideal orthodontic treatment involves qualitative and quantitative measurements of dental and skeletal components to evaluate patients' discrepancies, such as facial, occlusal, and functional characteristics. Deciding between orthodontics and orthognathic surgery remains challenging, especially in borderline patients. Advances in technology are aiding clinical decisions in orthodontics. The increasing availability of data and the era of big data enable the use of artificial intelligence to guide clinicians' diagnoses. This study aims to test the capacity of different machine learning (ML) models to predict whether orthognathic surgery or orthodontics treatment is required, using soft and hard tissue cephalometric values. Methods A total of 920 lateral radiographs from patients previously treated with either conventional orthodontics or in combination with orthognathic surgery were used, comprising n = 558 Class II and n = 362 Class III patients, respectively. Thirty‐two measures were obtained from each cephalogram at the initial appointment. The subjects were randomly divided into training (n = 552), validation (n = 183), and test (n = 185) datasets, both as an entire sample and divided into Class II and Class III sub‐groups. The extracted data were evaluated using 10 machine learning models and by a four‐expert panel consisting of orthodontists (n = 2) and surgeons (n = 2). Results The combined prediction of 10 models showed top‐ranked performance in the testing dataset for accuracy, F1‐score, and AUC (entire sample: 0.707, 0.706, 0.791; Class II: 0.759, 0.758, 0.824; Class III: 0.822, 0.807, 0.89). Conclusions The proposed combined 10 ML approach model accurately predicted the need for orthognathic surgery, showing better performance in Class III patients.
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine