Abstract:Objective: to evaluate microshear bond strength of CAD/CAM composite block and hybrid ceramic block repaired by direct resin composite restoration with and without surface treatment.Materials and Methods: Two different CAD/CAM restorative materials were tested in the present study: hybrid ceramic blocks (Vita Enamic) and resin composite blocks (Grandio). Six sections were prepared from each CAD/CAM blocks. The sections from each block type were randomly divided into three groups according to the surface treatment performed. Control group: the specimens were ground with a grinding machine. Etching gel Group: 37% phosphoric acid etching gel was applied occlusally on the surface of the section and CoJet Group. the surface of all groups were then silanized using Bis-Silane then bonding agent Futura bond DC was applied. A polyethylene micro tubes were prepared that were held in place with a tweezer on the uncured then light cured for 10 seconds Resin composite (Grandioso X-tra) was packed inside the microtubes and light cured. All specimens were prepared by the same operator at 22.0–22.5 ˚C (room temperature) and relative humidity of 50%. The specimens were further divided into two groups according to storage conditions. Half of the specimens were thermocycled in distilled water for 5000 cycles in a 5–55˚C water bath with a dwell time of 30 seconds and a transfer time of 5 seconds. The other specimens were stored in distilled water for 2 days. Microshear bond strength was performed and fractographic analysis to determine the failure mode. Statistical analysis was then performed using a commercially available software program (SPSS 19; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). As data were not normally distributed, significance of the difference between different groups within the same surface pretreatment was evaluated using Kruskall Wallis test. Mann Whitney U test was used for pairwise comparisons and to study the effect of surface pre-treatment. The interaction of restoration and type of pretreatment variables was evaluated using 3 ways ANOVA. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05.Results: Three ways ANOVA test revealed that each of the material type (composite/hybrid ceramic), the subgroup type group (control/etching/Cojet) and the thermocycling (Yes/No) variables resulted in a statistically significant difference (p=0.00, p=0.00, p=0.003 respectively). Interaction of the subgroup (control/etching/Cojet) variable with the thermocycling (Yes/No) variable and the material (composite/hybrid ceramic) variable showed a statistically significant difference (P=0.023, p=0.001 respectively). Moreover, interaction of thermocycling and material variable resulted in a significant difference (p=0.034). However, interaction of the 3 study variables (material, subgroup, thermocycling) was not statistically significant (p=0.165). The failure mode of the tested specimens analyzed using Scanning Electron Microscope at magnification 80X was commonly mixed type of failure (adhesive failure between resin composite restoration and CAD/CAM blocks with cohesive failure within resin composite restoration).Conclusions: Grandio composite blocks is very promising materials and their optimum long lasting repair potentiality that offers to the clinicians great chance to easily repair the defective restoration with safety. Surface treatment using Phosphoric acid or Cojet system greatly improve the bond strength between composite repair system and hybrid ceramic or composite blocks. The bond performance of repaired composite blocks was much more greater than than that of repaired hybrid ceramic. Thermocycling affect the bond durability of repaired hybrid ceramic blocks and composite blocks.Further investigations focusing on the effect of different surface treatments to yield results that lead to concrete clinical recommendations are needed to evaluate the long term durability of new CAD/CAM materials.

The effect of different surface preparation methods and various aging periods on microtensile bond strength for composite resin repair

Influence of Casein Phosphopeptide-Amorphous Calcium Phosphate Application, Smear Layer Removal, and Storage Time on Resin-Dentin Bonding

Repair of Bulk-Fill and Nanohybrid Resin Composites: Effect of Surface Conditioning, Adhesive Promoters, and Long-Term Aging

Effects of different surface treatments on surface topography and bond strength in the repair of fiber‐reinforced dentin composite

Effects of Er,Cr:YSGG Laser Surface Treatments and Composites with Different Viscosities on the Repair Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Resin Nanoceramic

Removal of Different Thicknesses Influences the Repair Bond Strength of Dental Resin Composites

Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Repair Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Resin-Matrix Ceramics

The Effect of Mechanical Alteration on Repair Bond Strength of S-PRG-Filler-Based Resin Composite Materials

[Effect of thermal cycling on the composite- composite repair bond strength].

Evaluation of Microtensile Bond Strength Between Resin Composite and Glass Ceramic

Surface roughness of different types of resin composites after artificial aging procedures: an in vitro study

The effects of different surface treatments applied to milled PMMA denture base material on repair bond strength

Effect of Different Surface Treatment Methods on the Shear Bond Strength of Resin Composite/Zirconia for Intra-oral Repair of Zirconia Restorations

Influence of surface treatment on repair bond strength of CAD/CAM long-term provisional restorative materials: an in vitro study

Repair strength of dimethacrylate-based composites resins: Effect of sandblasting, adhesive bonding, and thermocycling

The Effect of Different Decontamination Methods on the Micro-Tensile Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Resin-Based Blocks to Resin Cement

Effects of Artificial Aging of Direct Resin Nano-Hybrid Composite on Mean Bond Strength Values for Veneer Ceramic Samples

The effect of Er:YAG laser and different surface conditioning procedures on microtensile bond strength of the fissure sealant containing amorphous calcium phosphate after artificial aging

Effects of chemical surface treatments of quartz and glass fiber posts on the retention of a composite resin

Repair of Composites: Effect of Laser and Different Surface Treatments

Repair potentiality of CAD/CAM composite block and hybrid ceramic block by direct resin composite restoration with and without surface treatment