The Theoretical Roots of Marginal Optimization Model and Its Legal Application
Ai Jiahui
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19836/j.cnki.37-1100/c.2023.06.013
2023-01-01
Abstract:The marginal optimization model of neoclassical economics constitutes the core theorical framework in the economic analysis of law,whether from the positive level or the normative level.As the neoclassical economics based on the rationalism tradition abandons the classical economics based the empirical tradition,so it does not effectively explain the real world.Although the neoclassical economics sets up an optimal equilibrium system with the help of mathematical tools,such as calculus,but this absolute thinking to find the optimal result has become a kind of theoretical fictionalization.For example,the theory of optimal standardization in economic analysis of property law is a typical theoretic example of neoclassical economics based on the philosophy of rationalism"invading"the science of law.However,not only its five theoretical hypotheses,such as the externalized information cost,a new type of property rights trading market,the existence of the numerous types of property rights simultaneously,the incremental type of property rights in the real world only with the information cost and the frustration cost,and the perfect rationality and the perfect information of the decision-makers,cannot be tested by the real world,but also its logic of argumentation based on the internalization of externalized information costs cannot be justified. Based on the theoretical judgment,we find the logical relationship between positive economics and normative economics which is implied"the logical fallacy of denying the antecedent".Also,we show that this logical fallacy determines the theoretical framework of economic analysis of law directly and the theoretical failure of its application in law indirectly by way of transition theory agent of the Coase theorem,whether the rule-making of legislative level or the application of law of judicial level. Specifically,1)economic analysis of law insists that the optimal standard that should have been achieved at zero transaction costs(the optimal amount of property rights,the optimal amount of prevention,the optimal amount of evidence,etc.)is the natural goal for law to pursue,however,the problem lies in the fact that since the prerequisites for realizing the optimal standard are simply not available,this normative pursuit not only lacks practical feasibility and legitimacy,but also lacks social traditional roots and historical sense of institutional development.2)in economic analysis of law,the role played by law is to try to design the optimal legal system in the corresponding cost-benefit equation for x and y,respectively,to take the minimum value of the partial differential.But the problem is that in the real world there are no such absolutely optimal systems based on optimal criteria.3)in the marginal optimization model of legal economics,the law is seen as the"savior"of the problem of negative externalities,and the legislator or judge has the ability to set different kinds of optimal standards to maximize social welfare or minimize social costs by internalizing external costs.The problem with this theoretical framework,however,is that it fails to examine specific legal rules as a system at all,which leads to a complete failure to consider not only the costs of defining and operating the law,but also the difficulty of effectively assessing the real-world impact of specific legal systems.