A quantitative approach to choose among multiple mutually exclusive decisions: comparative expected utility theory

Pengyu Zhu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1801.02422

2018-01-08

Abstract:Mutually exclusive decisions have been studied for decades. Many well-known decision theories have been defined to help people either to make rational decisions or to interpret people's behaviors, such as expected utility theory, regret theory, prospect theory, and so on. The paper argues that none of these decision theories are designed to provide practical, normative and quantitative approaches for multiple mutually exclusive decisions. Different decision-makers should naturally make different choices for the same decision question, as they have different understandings and feelings on the same possible <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://outcomes.The" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a> author tries to capture the different understandings and feelings from different decision-makers, and model them into a quantitative decision evaluation process, which everyone could benefit from. The basic elements in classic expected utility theory are kept in the new decision theory, but the influences from mutually exclusive decisions will also be modeled into the evaluation process. This may sound like regret theory, but the new approach is designed to fit multiple mutually exclusive decision scenarios, and it does not require a definition of probability weighting function. The new theory is designed to be simple and straightforward to use, and the results are expected to be rational for each decision-maker.

General Economics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to provide a practical, normative, and quantitative method to help decision - makers make choices among multiple mutually exclusive decisions. Existing decision - making theories, such as Expected Utility Theory (EUT), Regret Theory, and Prospect Theory, etc., although they play a certain role in explaining people's decision - making behaviors or guiding rational decision - making, they are not specifically designed to handle the situation of multiple mutually exclusive decisions. In addition, these theories usually need to define some individual psychological factors, such as regret - joy functions and probability weighting functions, which are very inconvenient in practical applications.

The author believes that different decision - makers should make different choices for the same decision problem because they have different understandings and feelings about the possible results. Therefore, the author attempts to capture the different understandings and feelings of different decision - makers and model them into a quantitative decision - evaluation process so that everyone can benefit from it. Specifically, the paper introduces the concept of "Comparative Cost of Chance (CCC)", which is a new method aiming to overcome the limitations of existing theories, especially when dealing with multiple mutually exclusive decisions.

By introducing CCC, the paper proposes a new decision - making theory - Comparative Expected Utility Theory (CEUT). CEUT is based on the classical Expected Utility Theory and takes into account the influence of other mutually exclusive decisions to evaluate decision options more comprehensively. CEUT aims to provide a normative method for decision - makers with various risk preferences to evaluate multiple mutually exclusive decision options.