Mechanical and Electrochemical Stability Improvement of SiC-Reinforced Silicon-Based Composite Anode for Li-Ion Batteries
Mohammad Furquan,Manoj K. Jangid,Anish Raj Khatribail,Savithri Vijayalakshmi,Amartya Mukhopadhyay,Sagar Mitra
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.0c02523
IF: 6.4
2020-12-09
ACS Applied Energy Materials
Abstract:Extreme volume changes and concomitant mechanical instabilities (viz., origin and proliferation of cracking) in Si-based anodes are responsible for premature failure in lithium-ion batteries. Thus, it is a crucial hurdle toward the development of high-performance Si-based batteries, especially in the current scenario of electric vehicles. Accordingly, this research demonstrates a significant improvement in the mechanical stainability of Si-based anode material via in situ incorporation of carbide with a specific design, thereby bestowing outstanding stability in the electrochemical performance. At this juncture, we have established a bridge between nanomechanical and electrochemical properties, investigated via nanoindentation and in-operando stress measurements during electrochemical cycling for Si and in situ reinforced Si–SiC composite. Enhancing the hardness (H) of Si–SiC composite to almost twice as well as enhancing the hardness to effective Young's modulus (E*) ratio (H3/E*2) of the same to almost thrice than that of Si, helped resist the occurrence of plastic deformation and cracking in significant terms. In-operando study shows the typical stress flattening (cum, anisotropic behavior) in the case of the unreinforced Si electrode, which is a manifestation of plastic flow/cracking. By contrast, monotonous stress profiles and absence of the signature of plastic flow/cracking are observed for the Si–SiC electrode, which is an advantage for long cycle life, as observed here. Overall, this kind of experimental study could establish the nanomechanical to electrochemical tie-up, leading to 82% capacity retention over 650 cycles in a Li-ion full-cell along with the Si–SiC composite anode. The "power cycle" of the Si–SiC composite anode, with a variation of current density from 0.5 to 6.0 A g–1, also reveals excellent stability up to 2500 cycles.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsaem.0c02523.Figure S1, an indication of surface roughness variation of unreinforced Si and reinforced Si or Si–SiC pellets, as determined using a profilometer; Figure S2, ToF-SIMS mapping of unreinforced Si pellet; Figure S3, impedance analysis of Si–SiC composite electrode in Li-ion full-cell (with LiCoO2); Figure S4, representation of a schematic of the typical load–displacement curve obtained with nanoindentation; Figure S5, ratio of hardness and effective elastic modulus (H3/E*2) concerning hardness; Figure S6, cracks surrounding or not surrounding microindents, as observed using FEG-SEM for unreinforced Si and reinforced Si or Si–SiC; Figure S7, multibeam optical stress measurement setup for in-operando stress measurement during electrochemical cycling; Figures S8 and S9, in-operando plots for stress profiles, superimposed on the galvanostatic discharge/charge profiles with various experimental parameters; Table S1, discharge capacity and cycle performance literature data for Si–SiC composite; Tables S2 and S3, data from the nanoindentation load–displacement curves for unreinforced Si and reinforced Si (i.e., Si–SiC composite) as well as hardness (H) and effective elastic modulus (E*) obtained from the nanoindentation for the same; Tables S4 and S5, the various materials parameters used for estimating the magnitudes of the stresses, as monitored in-operando during electrochemical cycling (PDF)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
materials science, multidisciplinary,chemistry, physical,energy & fuels